Location: Sir Thomas More

Discussion: Thomas MooreReported This is a featured thread

Showing 1 - 20 of 24  |  Show  posts at a time
2 | Next

charlucy
Thomas Moore
Apr 14 2009, 10:28 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 14 2009, 10:28 PM EDT
If you were Thomas Moore will you have signed the Act of Succession or the Oath of Supremacy in order to saved the life of you and let your family lived in peace Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: Oath Thomas More
Maggie-AnneB.
Maggie-AnneB.
1. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 14 2009, 10:34 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 14 2009, 10:34 PM EDT
"If you were Thomas Moore will you have signed the Act of Succession or the Oath of Supremacy in order to saved the life of you and let your family lived in peace"
If I were Thomas More, I would have signed both. I totally respect that he didn't sign the Oath of Supremacy, but I feel like he was being a *bit* selfish. His family were going into poverty, and he kind of just let it happened. But I respect what he did, but if I were him, I would have signed the damn Oath/ Act!
Do you find this valuable?    
BlackNan
BlackNan
2. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 14 2009, 10:41 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 14 2009, 10:41 PM EDT
I would have signed as well(both). I can understand not wanting to have your principles violated, but wouldn't the pope give a dispensation for signing under duress? As the family of a traitor, all lands and income would be forfeit, as well as being branded as the family of a traitor. My principles are not worth making my loved ones suffer, especially when in the end, it doesn't change who I believe in(God) Do you find this valuable?    
Maggie-AnneB.
Maggie-AnneB.
3. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 14 2009, 11:11 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 14 2009, 11:11 PM EDT
"I would have signed as well(both). I can understand not wanting to have your principles violated, but wouldn't the pope give a dispensation for signing under duress? As the family of a traitor, all lands and income would be forfeit, as well as being branded as the family of a traitor. My principles are not worth making my loved ones suffer, especially when in the end, it doesn't change who I believe in(God)"
Agreed!
Do you find this valuable?    
Ebusitanus
Ebusitanus
4. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 9:15 AM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 9:15 AM EDT
More should have encouraged France and the Emperor to invade England before it got to late. Do you find this valuable?    
LadyLizzy
LadyLizzy
5. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 9:20 AM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 9:21 AM EDT
"More should have encouraged France and the Emperor to invade England before it got to late."
He was his king's loyal servant, so much for that idea. I would have signed as well to spare my family the fate of being impoverished. It's certainly heroic to die for your principles, but I would have felt bad to leave my children beggars.
Do you find this valuable?    
Ebusitanus
Ebusitanus
6. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 9:39 AM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 9:39 AM EDT
For all the good intentions of loyalty towards the King, much good did it do to them. Its also a convenient excuse for cowards like show-Brandon to go and kill off hunderds.
The decent action was what Aske and the others did in 1536 with the uprising. To bad they did not finish the job and had the King thrown into a dungeon.
Do you find this valuable?    
Reggie19
Reggie19
7. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 9:54 AM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 9:54 AM EDT
"If I were Thomas More, I would have signed both. I totally respect that he didn't sign the Oath of Supremacy, but I feel like he was being a *bit* selfish. His family were going into poverty, and he kind of just let it happened. But I respect what he did, but if I were him, I would have signed the damn Oath/ Act!"
I would have signed it, but then again i'm not as faithful to my religion as Thomas More was, i respect his honor and strength in not doing so, but i haven't the bravery or the courage to face the horrible punishment he could have received instead (disembowling, drawing, quartering etc), but IMO, i though More was also quite selfish that he couldn't sacrifice his beliefs for his family, personally, i'd do anything for my own family!
Do you find this valuable?    
TillyT2
TillyT2
8. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 10:45 AM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 10:45 AM EDT
"More should have encouraged France and the Emperor to invade England before it got to late."
As an Englishwoman I take exception to the fact that you think my country should be ruled by either Spain or France!!
Do you find this valuable?    
Maggie-AnneB.
Maggie-AnneB.
9. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 11:33 AM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 11:33 AM EDT
"More should have encouraged France and the Emperor to invade England before it got to late."
If More had done that (and he never would), that would have been the Ultimate Treason. Everyone would have been behind Henry to have More beheaded.
Do you find this valuable?    
Maggie-AnneB.
Maggie-AnneB.
10. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 11:35 AM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 11:35 AM EDT
"For all the good intentions of loyalty towards the King, much good did it do to them. Its also a convenient excuse for cowards like show-Brandon to go and kill off hunderds.
The decent action was what Aske and the others did in 1536 with the uprising. To bad they did not finish the job and had the King thrown into a dungeon."
The Rebels did not set out to *bring down* the King. They just wanted their monasteries, etc. They didn't want another King, where did you get that idea?
Do you find this valuable?    
Nofretete
Nofretete
11. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 11:42 AM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 11:42 AM EDT
"For all the good intentions of loyalty towards the King, much good did it do to them. Its also a convenient excuse for cowards like show-Brandon to go and kill off hunderds.
The decent action was what Aske and the others did in 1536 with the uprising. To bad they did not finish the job and had the King thrown into a dungeon."
So, you would have said NO to the king in all these matters and risked getting your head cut off (and put your family in danger)? I wouldn't have, call that loyalty or self-preservation or cowardice, whatever you like.

You can certainly call More brave for what he did, but he was also selfish by leaving his family in a very bad situation after his death.
Do you find this valuable?    

LadyJane1961
12. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 2:11 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 2:11 PM EDT
no i would not sign the oathjustlike thomas more did. it is not selfish what he did his family knew about his beliefs his devotion to his faith. he did nt one day wake up and said his whole life about god. thomas and his wife was married a long time his wife knew about his beliefs so it wasnt a surprise to her that he will refuse to sign the oath. i do have symathy for his family but she must have known that he would not sign that oath. maybe it is a little selfish of them to insist that he should sign the oath. and drop his beliefs just because they didnt want to lose their things. i would not expect my husband to drop his beliefs and sign the oath. Do you find this valuable?    

charlucy
13. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 2:51 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 2:51 PM EDT
"no i would not sign the oathjustlike thomas more did. it is not selfish what he did his family knew about his beliefs his devotion to his faith. he did nt one day wake up and said his whole life about god. thomas and his wife was married a long time his wife knew about his beliefs so it wasnt a surprise to her that he will refuse to sign the oath. i do have symathy for his family but she must have known that he would not sign that oath. maybe it is a little selfish of them to insist that he should sign the oath. and drop his beliefs just because they didnt want to lose their things. i would not expect my husband to drop his beliefs and sign the oath."
LadyJane1961 I'm sorry but i will have to disagree with you, yes Thomas Moore was very strong in his beliefs, but he should have thought of his family and how they were going to survive if he didn't he should have signed even if he didn't believe sometimes it'd better to walk hand in hand with the devil then stand in his path
Do you find this valuable?    
Hever
Hever
14. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 2:53 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 2:53 PM EDT
"More should have encouraged France and the Emperor to invade England before it got to late."
That wouldn't have happened because More wouldn't have turned against the King, I would have been weak and signed.
Do you find this valuable?    
Reggie19
Reggie19
15. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 2:58 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 2:58 PM EDT
"LadyJane1961 I'm sorry but i will have to disagree with you, yes Thomas Moore was very strong in his beliefs, but he should have thought of his family and how they were going to survive if he didn't he should have signed even if he didn't believe sometimes it'd better to walk hand in hand with the devil then stand in his path"
I love that saying, and i will have to agree with you, but it is so hard to argue against Thomas More with the man was made into a saint! Can anyone see beyond that where he is concerned? He has my utmost respect, but the family was living off of the wage he received in offering his services in philosophy to the King, i wonder how they lived without that income after he was declared a traitor and executed?
Do you find this valuable?    

charlucy
16. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 3:02 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 3:02 PM EDT
"no i would not sign the oathjustlike thomas more did. it is not selfish what he did his family knew about his beliefs his devotion to his faith. he did nt one day wake up and said his whole life about god. thomas and his wife was married a long time his wife knew about his beliefs so it wasnt a surprise to her that he will refuse to sign the oath. i do have symathy for his family but she must have known that he would not sign that oath. maybe it is a little selfish of them to insist that he should sign the oath. and drop his beliefs just because they didnt want to lose their things. i would not expect my husband to drop his beliefs and sign the oath."
no LadyJane1961 but i will have to disagree with you but i would have sign both just to saved my family a lifetime of grieve and pain, yes he was strong in his beliefs, but his family comes first, maybe sometimes LadyJane1961 it is sometimes better to walk with the devil then stand in his path.
Do you find this valuable?    
Hever
Hever
17. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 3:02 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 3:02 PM EDT
I can see both sides to the More's story, and I think Lady Jane is quite brave to say she would not be forced to sign against her beliefs. Do you find this valuable?    
angelosdaughter
angelosdaughter
18. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 3:30 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 3:51 PM EDT
"If you were Thomas Moore will you have signed the Act of Succession or the Oath of Supremacy in order to saved the life of you and let your family lived in peace"
If I were Thomas More, I would have his conscience, so of course I would not have signed the Oath. The mind of a martyr does not consider consquences (St. Perpetua gave her newborn baby to her family, so she could accept martyrdom), but More did. He tried to protect his family by placing his property in a sort of trust as soon as he realized that his refusal to sign the Oath would probably result in his imprisonment. In small ways, he succeeded, but much was seized by Henry anyway. It seems some of More's children were in tune with his thinking, although his wife was not. The two daughters, one adopted, and one by blood related, were in agreement with him, and carried on in his way after his death. Margaret Giggs, More's adopted daughter was given More's corpse, and assisted his elder daughter Meg, with her father's burial in St. Peter ad Vincula, afterward she worked at Newgate Prison, helping to bathe and feed the inmates. She eventually fled persecution with her family to Louvain, where she died. Meg took the Oath but with a reservation ('insofar as will stand the will of God'; doing so allowed her to visit her father in prison because Cromwell thought she might convince More to take it also; she did not try) devoted her the rest of her life (she died at age 39, and was buried holding her father's skull) to her children and to getting More's writings published. She, too, came under charges of attempting to create a cult after she ransomed More's head from London Bridge, but was able to convince the court that she was not.
Continued...
1  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
angelosdaughter
angelosdaughter
19. RE: Thomas Moore
Apr 15 2009, 3:35 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2009, 3:35 PM EDT
"If I were Thomas More, I would have his conscience, so of course I would not have signed the Oath. The mind of a martyr does not consider consquences (St. Perpetua gave her newborn baby to her family, so she could accept martyrdom), but More did. He tried to protect his family by placing his property in a sort of trust as soon as he realized that his refusal to sign the Oath would probably result in his imprisonment. In small ways, he succeeded, but much was seized by Henry anyway. It seems some of More'schildren were in tune with his thinking, although his wife was not. The two daughters, one adopted, and one by blood retated, were in agreement with him, and carried on in his way after his death. Margaret Giggs, More's adopted daughter was given More's corpse, and assisted his elder daughter Meg, with her father's burial in St. Peter ad Vincula, afterward she worked at Newgate Prison, helping to bathe and feed the inmates. She eventually fled persecution with her family to Louvain, where she died. Meg took the Oath but with a reservation ('insofar as will stand the will of God'; doing so allowed her to visit her father in prison because Cromwell thought she might convince More to take it also; she did not try) devoted her the rest of her life (she died at age 39, and was buried holding her father's skull) to her children and to getting More's writings published. She, too, came under charges of attempting to create a cult after she ransomed More's head from London Bridge, but was able to convince the court that she was not.
Continued..."
Several of the More sons-in-law and his son, John, (who had not taken the Oath up to that time, but had to take it, to be released) were imprisoned on charges of attempting to discredit Cranmer, but were eventually released. Giles Heron, the husband of More's daughter Cecily, was denounced for treason and disembowled at Tyburn. His wife, Cecily, was left destitute.
So, some of More's family shared his convictions and suffered for them.
And to answer the question in another way, If my spirit werer transplanted in to Thomas More, I hope my convictions would be as certain as his and that I would have his strength. He overcame his human weakness and made a good death. Most people these days would not have a clue.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
2 | Next

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)