Location: Cardinal Thomas Wolsey

Discussion: Wolsey-sympathy?Reported This is a featured thread

Showing 21 - 26 of 26  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2
karenofbethany
karenofbethany
20. RE: Wolsey-sympathy?
Mar 14 2009, 9:16 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 14 2009, 9:30 AM EDT
"Yes I did feel alot of sympathy for him, I thought Sam Neil did a fabulous job with the charactor and I found it heartrending when he was discarded and abandoned by all and sundry including those he thought were his friends.
'You often boast to me that you have the King's ear and often have fun with him, freely and according to your whims.This is like having fun with tamed lions-often it is harmless,but just as often there is fear of harm.Often he roars in rage for no reason,and suddenly the fun becomes fatal.' Thomas More"
Ahhh, brillant Thomas More was always right on the money and never feared saying the truth. Thomas was a true friend to The King; a true friend never fears saying what is best for a person. Thanks for the quote.
Do you find this valuable?    
karenofbethany
karenofbethany
21. RE: Wolsey-sympathy?
Mar 14 2009, 9:18 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 14 2009, 9:18 AM EDT
"Sam Neill certainly showed the human side to Wolsey ...but I think the real Wolsey let power go to his head. He had really been the power behind the throne in Henry's youth and didn't calculate Henry taking back his power and being influenced by others. He completely underestimated the Boleyns and paid the price. However they in turn paid the price of underestimating Cromwell and so it went on. Ambition which became complacency did all of them in....in the end. You had to be alert to the what was going on in the intimate circle of the King or pay the consequences.

I don't think you can totally blame Henry....you have to blame the flawed system of personal monarchy and the times in which he lived. He did believe he was appointed by God and therefore above everyone else. He had no empathy ...he was never taught it. I do believe that empathy is a learned behaviour.

As Wyatt said so aptly..."around the throne the thunder rolls". If you have ambitions to be in the vicinity of the throne ...be prepared for the fall out. "
Ambition and complacency, the deadliest combination. It's what put Hitler into power and kept him there when it was so obvious what was going on. Actually ambition and complacency killed Christ himself. Ambition of the "councils" and Judas, complacency of his followers who abandoned him when the hour struck.
Do you find this valuable?    
karenofbethany
karenofbethany
22. RE: Wolsey-sympathy?
Mar 14 2009, 9:24 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 14 2009, 9:32 AM EDT
"John Foxe who was born c. 1517 & wrote the Book of Martyrs said of Henry :

"While good counsel was about him, and could be heard, the king did much good. So again, when sinister and wicked counsel, under subtle and crafty pretences, had gotten once the foot in, thrusting truth and verity out of the prince's ears,how much religion and all good things went prosperously forward before,so much, on the contrary side, all revolted backward again."

So he is saying that Henry was influenced by the people around him and saying he was not totally to blame for the horrors perpetrated in his name. These were times when religion, politics & other dynasty issues were all merged into one government. In our modern times all these issues are kept separate whereas in Henry's court it was a boiling pot of many influences. I am not excusing Henry but just like Mary 1 - there are more factors involved than just personality."
I have to respond here and say that it was Henry's choice whether to follow his councillors or not. Of course all of the monarchs were under that particular stress but they were responsible to be aware of what was really going on. You must admit a lot of Henry's activities were specifically linked to his personal choices - and immature personality, always having to be "in love" with the wife, etc. The women at that time were forced to take who they could get -. I'd go so far to say that it was Henry who demanded his will be followed and his councillors "advised him" based on how they could say what he wanted to hear to allow them to remain in favor (power or even alive. Perhaps he started out with the right intention of remaining married to Katherine and wanting his male heir - but he degenerated into a big baby, IMO, and countless people suffered as a result - he ordered executions and did not stay around to see the consequences...
Do you find this valuable?    
MsSquirrly
MsSquirrly
23. RE: Wolsey-sympathy?
Mar 14 2009, 12:33 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 14 2009, 12:33 PM EDT
well Wolsey was in favour of the divorce per se but not with Anne Boleyn....he had other plans which included an alliance with France and a french princess. Poor Wolsey never thought Anne would amount to anything except a mistress. Massive miscalculation.

There is a line in one of the season 3 promo videos where Henry says "Everyone has their own agenda, it doesn't matter what I want". To some extent that was true that he really couldn't trust anyone and hence the reason he became so paranoid in his later years. Even today with our celebrity mad society, those who make it to the top of the heap and have the power that comes with money and status.....still feel the same thing as Henry (eg.Elvis Presley etc).....you never know who you can trust and "the users" come out of the woodwork. I think Henry lost perspective completely because of his position in life. Ultimately he was not a happy man. To have everything and at the same time....no one you can totally trust would mess with anyone's mind.
Do you find this valuable?    
karenofbethany
karenofbethany
24. RE: Wolsey-sympathy?
Mar 14 2009, 5:27 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 14 2009, 5:27 PM EDT
"well Wolsey was in favour of the divorce per se but not with Anne Boleyn....he had other plans which included an alliance with France and a french princess. Poor Wolsey never thought Anne would amount to anything except a mistress. Massive miscalculation.

There is a line in one of the season 3 promo videos where Henry says "Everyone has their own agenda, it doesn't matter what I want". To some extent that was true that he really couldn't trust anyone and hence the reason he became so paranoid in his later years. Even today with our celebrity mad society, those who make it to the top of the heap and have the power that comes with money and status.....still feel the same thing as Henry (eg.Elvis Presley etc).....you never know who you can trust and "the users" come out of the woodwork. I think Henry lost perspective completely because of his position in life. Ultimately he was not a happy man. To have everything and at the same time....no one you can totally trust would mess with anyone's mind."
You know, I always think of O.J. Simpson. By the time those murders were commited, he had been a star for a long, long, time and nobody every thought to question his choices and actions. Women were like so many pieces of candy in a box. He was outraged that his wife would think to question him, defy him, or have another relationship. There have been lots of celebrities - really gifted people - corrupted by fame and "yes" men, who begin to believe in their own omnipotence.
Do you find this valuable?    

Truth84
25. RE: Wolsey-sympathy?
Mar 15 2009, 3:53 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 15 2009, 3:53 AM EDT
"I do blame Henry for JUST ABOUT everything. He was the King of England, and that's no excuse for the things he did, the crimes he himself committed. He messed up so many times and it was ALWAYS someone else that had to clean up the mess. Cromwell, for example, got Henry his divorce from Anne of Cleves, and Cromwell still lost his head. Henry didn't like Anne, for basically no apparent reason. He killed Cromwell, and I blame him, Henry, for the Cleves problem. If Anne Boleyn did sleep around with other men, I blame Henry for that. He was a terror of a husband! I see no reason why people should make excuses for him. If he thought himself so powerful, so "Manly", then he should have been a man and taken responsibility for everything. LadyJane1961 you can take this paragraph as a attack on you, but it isn't, and I am not trying to change your opinion. Also, us Non-Henry Likers, should be allowed to not like him. "
Henry is to blame for some but Anne knew what times she grew up in and could have been more subservient especially since she just replaced a beloved queen and the people hated her. Anne was born into nobility and knew the court but still needed to learn about how to be a queen
Do you find this valuable?    
Previous | 1 2