Sign in or 

|
karenofbethany |
20. RE: Wolsey-sympathy?
Mar 14 2009, 9:16 AM EDT
| Post edited: Mar 14 2009, 9:30 AM EDT
"Yes I did feel alot of sympathy for him, I thought Sam Neil did a fabulous job with the charactor and I found it heartrending when he was discarded and abandoned by all and sundry including those he thought were his friends.Ahhh, brillant Thomas More was always right on the money and never feared saying the truth. Thomas was a true friend to The King; a true friend never fears saying what is best for a person. Thanks for the quote. Do you find this valuable? |
|
karenofbethany |
21. RE: Wolsey-sympathy?
Mar 14 2009, 9:18 AM EDT
"Sam Neill certainly showed the human side to Wolsey ...but I think the real Wolsey let power go to his head. He had really been the power behind the throne in Henry's youth and didn't calculate Henry taking back his power and being influenced by others. He completely underestimated the Boleyns and paid the price. However they in turn paid the price of underestimating Cromwell and so it went on. Ambition which became complacency did all of them in....in the end. You had to be alert to the what was going on in the intimate circle of the King or pay the consequences.Ambition and complacency, the deadliest combination. It's what put Hitler into power and kept him there when it was so obvious what was going on. Actually ambition and complacency killed Christ himself. Ambition of the "councils" and Judas, complacency of his followers who abandoned him when the hour struck. Do you find this valuable? |
|
karenofbethany |
22. RE: Wolsey-sympathy?
Mar 14 2009, 9:24 AM EDT
| Post edited: Mar 14 2009, 9:32 AM EDT
"John Foxe who was born c. 1517 & wrote the Book of Martyrs said of Henry :I have to respond here and say that it was Henry's choice whether to follow his councillors or not. Of course all of the monarchs were under that particular stress but they were responsible to be aware of what was really going on. You must admit a lot of Henry's activities were specifically linked to his personal choices - and immature personality, always having to be "in love" with the wife, etc. The women at that time were forced to take who they could get -. I'd go so far to say that it was Henry who demanded his will be followed and his councillors "advised him" based on how they could say what he wanted to hear to allow them to remain in favor (power or even alive. Perhaps he started out with the right intention of remaining married to Katherine and wanting his male heir - but he degenerated into a big baby, IMO, and countless people suffered as a result - he ordered executions and did not stay around to see the consequences... Do you find this valuable? |
|
MsSquirrly |
23. RE: Wolsey-sympathy?
Mar 14 2009, 12:33 PM EDT
well Wolsey was in favour of the divorce per se but not with Anne Boleyn....he had other plans which included an alliance with France and a french princess. Poor Wolsey never thought Anne would amount to anything except a mistress. Massive miscalculation. There is a line in one of the season 3 promo videos where Henry says "Everyone has their own agenda, it doesn't matter what I want". To some extent that was true that he really couldn't trust anyone and hence the reason he became so paranoid in his later years. Even today with our celebrity mad society, those who make it to the top of the heap and have the power that comes with money and status.....still feel the same thing as Henry (eg.Elvis Presley etc).....you never know who you can trust and "the users" come out of the woodwork. I think Henry lost perspective completely because of his position in life. Ultimately he was not a happy man. To have everything and at the same time....no one you can totally trust would mess with anyone's mind. Do you find this valuable? |
|
karenofbethany |
24. RE: Wolsey-sympathy?
Mar 14 2009, 5:27 PM EDT
"well Wolsey was in favour of the divorce per se but not with Anne Boleyn....he had other plans which included an alliance with France and a french princess. Poor Wolsey never thought Anne would amount to anything except a mistress. Massive miscalculation.You know, I always think of O.J. Simpson. By the time those murders were commited, he had been a star for a long, long, time and nobody every thought to question his choices and actions. Women were like so many pieces of candy in a box. He was outraged that his wife would think to question him, defy him, or have another relationship. There have been lots of celebrities - really gifted people - corrupted by fame and "yes" men, who begin to believe in their own omnipotence. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Truth84 |
25. RE: Wolsey-sympathy?
Mar 15 2009, 3:53 AM EDT
"I do blame Henry for JUST ABOUT everything. He was the King of England, and that's no excuse for the things he did, the crimes he himself committed. He messed up so many times and it was ALWAYS someone else that had to clean up the mess. Cromwell, for example, got Henry his divorce from Anne of Cleves, and Cromwell still lost his head. Henry didn't like Anne, for basically no apparent reason. He killed Cromwell, and I blame him, Henry, for the Cleves problem. If Anne Boleyn did sleep around with other men, I blame Henry for that. He was a terror of a husband! I see no reason why people should make excuses for him. If he thought himself so powerful, so "Manly", then he should have been a man and taken responsibility for everything. LadyJane1961 you can take this paragraph as a attack on you, but it isn't, and I am not trying to change your opinion. Also, us Non-Henry Likers, should be allowed to not like him. "Henry is to blame for some but Anne knew what times she grew up in and could have been more subservient especially since she just replaced a beloved queen and the people hated her. Anne was born into nobility and knew the court but still needed to learn about how to be a queen Do you find this valuable? |