Location: Ambassador Chapuys

Discussion: Yay! Chapuys is backReported This is a featured thread

Showing 1 - 20 of 24  |  Show  posts at a time
2 | Next
HeroineAddict
HeroineAddict
Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 8 2009, 10:56 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 10:58 AM EDT
I had a little squee when I saw the promo pics, plus Chapuys. I hadn't heard anything about him coming back for S3, and it would have been a shame because he's a great, mercurial character. Love Anthony Brophy :-) 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: Chapuys characters Season 3
MsSquirrly
MsSquirrly
1. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 8 2009, 11:24 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 11:24 AM EDT
"I had a little squee when I saw the promo pics, plus Chapuys. I hadn't heard anything about him coming back for S3, and it would have been a shame because he's a great, mercurial character. Love Anthony Brophy :-)"
yes and so much of what has been written by historians about this time is based on the Historical Chapuys' letters and he was a pivotal character because he represented spain's catholic influence on the court factions in Henry's time. He was fiercely pro-Katherine/Mary and anti-Anne and subsequently influenced Jane to some extent.

Its interesting though what Retha Warnicke said about the information he provides about the time :

"A close reading of the Ambassador's correspondence between 1529 and 1536 readily indicates that his information should be divided into at least the following four categories;
(1) repetition of ubiquitous rumors at court
(2) information deliberately leaked to him by royal servants
(3) original and sometimes unsubstantiated speculation of his own
(4)actual first-hand information such as interviews with the king and his ministers, announcements of arrivals and departures of envoys and seasonal movements of the court.
Often it is extremely difficult to decide into which of the first 3 categories the gossipy, second-hand news should fall, a difficulty that must alert scholars to the need for handling of his letters with caution."

- Retha Warnicke in her introduction to her book, The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
karenofbethany
karenofbethany
2. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 8 2009, 11:31 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 11:31 AM EDT
"yes and so much of what has been written by historians about this time is based on the Historical Chapuys' letters and he was a pivotal character because he represented spain's catholic influence on the court factions in Henry's time. He was fiercely pro-Katherine/Mary and anti-Anne and subsequently influenced Jane to some extent.

Its interesting though what Retha Warnicke said about the information he provides about the time :

"A close reading of the Ambassador's correspondence between 1529 and 1536 readily indicates that his information should be divided into at least the following four categories;
(1) repetition of ubiquitous rumors at court
(2) information deliberately leaked to him by royal servants
(3) original and sometimes unsubstantiated speculation of his own
(4)actual first-hand information such as interviews with the king and his ministers, announcements of arrivals and departures of envoys and seasonal movements of the court.
Often it is extremely difficult to decide into which of the first 3 categories the gossipy, second-hand news should fall, a difficulty that must alert scholars to the need for handling of his letters with caution."

- Retha Warnicke in her introduction to her book, The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn"
He reminds me of that other famous diarist Samuel Pepys, though Pepys just scribbled on and on about things nobody felt were really important - they provide such a window into the times. I admire these men for their attention to detail. Of course I love to hear them describe the women's clothing and the impact persons and their conversations had on one another in that atmosphere where everybody was expected to season their speech with courtly phrases. The intrigue! The double meanings! Spies and counter spies, it makes your head spin to think about it.
Do you find this valuable?    
HeroineAddict
HeroineAddict
3. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 8 2009, 11:40 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 11:42 AM EDT
He reminds me of Pepys as well, as much for his reliance on rumour and innuendo in the place of fact as for his invaluable insight into the intimate life and times of his own era. I haven't read any of Chapuys' own writings, but there is something incredible about getting Pepys' first-hand perspective on a history that can otherwise be so distancing and detached. I remember being thrilled when I read a very casual observance of his of King Charles II walking in the royal gardens with John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester, (one of my favourite Restoration poets), who Pepys was aghast over having been pardoned after one of his many disgraces. It was such an everyday remark, but so personal somehow. Pepys was almost like the gossip magazine of his day, utterly unreliable but good fun all the same :) Do you find this valuable?    
beardedlady
beardedlady
4. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 8 2009, 1:49 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 1:49 PM EDT
I love the character that plays Chapuys too. It's weird but I could never picture him before the Tudors. And yes, I love reading Pepys diary. Some of his little sexual innuendos are kind of funny too.

I wonder how much false information was fed to Chapuys?
Do you find this valuable?    
karenofbethany
karenofbethany
5. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 8 2009, 4:45 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 4:45 PM EDT
"yes and so much of what has been written by historians about this time is based on the Historical Chapuys' letters and he was a pivotal character because he represented spain's catholic influence on the court factions in Henry's time. He was fiercely pro-Katherine/Mary and anti-Anne and subsequently influenced Jane to some extent.

Its interesting though what Retha Warnicke said about the information he provides about the time :

"A close reading of the Ambassador's correspondence between 1529 and 1536 readily indicates that his information should be divided into at least the following four categories;
(1) repetition of ubiquitous rumors at court
(2) information deliberately leaked to him by royal servants
(3) original and sometimes unsubstantiated speculation of his own
(4)actual first-hand information such as interviews with the king and his ministers, announcements of arrivals and departures of envoys and seasonal movements of the court.
Often it is extremely difficult to decide into which of the first 3 categories the gossipy, second-hand news should fall, a difficulty that must alert scholars to the need for handling of his letters with caution."

- Retha Warnicke in her introduction to her book, The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn"
In what way did Chapuys influence Jane?
Do you find this valuable?    
karenofbethany
karenofbethany
6. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 8 2009, 4:47 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 4:47 PM EDT
"I love the character that plays Chapuys too. It's weird but I could never picture him before the Tudors. And yes, I love reading Pepys diary. Some of his little sexual innuendos are kind of funny too.

I wonder how much false information was fed to Chapuys?"
I have always wondered about that - and about other diplomats. One book interesting is fiction, The Diary of Henry VIII by Margaret George. Did you read the scene when they are drinking the drugged irish wine and all of the men are spilling their secrets and real feelings?
Do you find this valuable?    
MsSquirrly
MsSquirrly
7. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 8 2009, 4:55 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 4:55 PM EDT
"In what way did Chapuys influence Jane?"
The court was divided by factions and Chapuys was at the forefront of the Catholic Faction...at the time of Henry tiring of Anne....he urged Jane to drop certain things in the kings ear .

Quote: "The ambassador advised her to drop heavy hints about Anne's heretical leanings in Henry's ear, and to say that the people of England would never accept her as their true Queen. She must say these things in the presence of her supporters, who would all then swear, on their allegiance to the King, that she spoke the truth.

Jane certainly acted upon this advice, and it had the desired effect upon the King, who was now receptive to criticism of his wife. Jane also followed her own instincts, and the advice of her friends, by not admitting Henry to her bed. Instead, she dropped heavy hints about marriage, which fell on fertile ground, and before long Henry began to behave towards her with great circumspection, leading others to believe that he was already considering her as a future wife.

From this time on, he took care to avoid any hint of scandal attaching itself to her name; her family and adherents were quick to notice this new deference on the part of the King, and Sir Francis Bryan told Jane's parents that they would shortly see their daughter 'well bestowed' in marriage"

[Alison Weir, The Six Wives of Henry VIII, p. 306].
Do you find this valuable?    
karenofbethany
karenofbethany
8. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 8 2009, 5:14 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 5:14 PM EDT
"The court was divided by factions and Chapuys was at the forefront of the Catholic Faction...at the time of Henry tiring of Anne....he urged Jane to drop certain things in the kings ear .

Quote: "The ambassador advised her to drop heavy hints about Anne's heretical leanings in Henry's ear, and to say that the people of England would never accept her as their true Queen. She must say these things in the presence of her supporters, who would all then swear, on their allegiance to the King, that she spoke the truth.

Jane certainly acted upon this advice, and it had the desired effect upon the King, who was now receptive to criticism of his wife. Jane also followed her own instincts, and the advice of her friends, by not admitting Henry to her bed. Instead, she dropped heavy hints about marriage, which fell on fertile ground, and before long Henry began to behave towards her with great circumspection, leading others to believe that he was already considering her as a future wife.

From this time on, he took care to avoid any hint of scandal attaching itself to her name; her family and adherents were quick to notice this new deference on the part of the King, and Sir Francis Bryan told Jane's parents that they would shortly see their daughter 'well bestowed' in marriage"

[Alison Weir, The Six Wives of Henry VIII, p. 306]."
Thanks so much for the info. I did not know.
Do you find this valuable?    
Anne'sCurls
Anne'sCurls
9. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 8 2009, 5:20 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 5:20 PM EDT
I hate Chapuys and I dont like that they didnt show his sympathy towards Anne when she was on trial. Do you find this valuable?    
MsSquirrly
MsSquirrly
10. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 8 2009, 5:24 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 5:24 PM EDT
"I hate Chapuys and I dont like that they didnt show his sympathy towards Anne when she was on trial."
well he wasnt sympathetic to Anne and always called her the concubine but he did believe she was innocent of the charges brought against her according to his account of the trial.
Do you find this valuable?    
Anne'sCurls
Anne'sCurls
11. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 8 2009, 5:25 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 5:25 PM EDT
That is what I mean by sympathetic, he hated Anne Boleyn the queen but he did not like what was being done to her. Do you find this valuable?    
LNor19
LNor19
12. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 8 2009, 8:04 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 8:06 PM EDT
"That is what I mean by sympathetic, he hated Anne Boleyn the queen but he did not like what was being done to her. "
Chapuys was by no means sympathetic to Anne's fate, he hated her as much as she hated him, he merely felt it was untasteful on Henry's part....Chapuys had a very dark and dry sense of humor.

But I will admit I like him, he was always a champion for Mary and Katherine during their exile, and continued to be supportive to Mary up to his death in 1556. It must've have done him good when she became Queen in '53.
Do you find this valuable?    
Anne'sCurls
Anne'sCurls
13. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 8 2009, 8:16 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 8 2009, 8:16 PM EDT
Fine if you don't like the word sympathetic then change the word. But I still wish they would have put in how he did not like the trial and execution. Do you find this valuable?    

Truth84
14. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 9 2009, 4:38 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 9 2009, 4:38 AM EDT
"Fine if you don't like the word sympathetic then change the word. But I still wish they would have put in how he did not like the trial and execution."
Your argument makes no sense, he hated her. he just knew the charges were phony.
Do you find this valuable?    
Anne'sCurls
Anne'sCurls
15. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 9 2009, 5:09 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 9 2009, 5:09 AM EDT
"Your argument makes no sense, he hated her. he just knew the charges were phony."
Well if you don't understand that human emotions are not black and white then that is your problem not mine.
0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Truth84
16. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 9 2009, 5:13 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 9 2009, 5:13 AM EDT
"Well if you don't understand that human emotions are not black and white then that is your problem not mine."
find me a quote where he feels sympathy for her. Until then u are just speculating. She hated him and he hated her. Even after she was dead he still reffered to her at the whore.
Do you find this valuable?    
karenofbethany
karenofbethany
17. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 9 2009, 6:01 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 9 2009, 6:07 AM EDT
"find me a quote where he feels sympathy for her. Until then u are just speculating. She hated him and he hated her. Even after she was dead he still reffered to her at the whore. "
Perhaps Chapuys did not "hate" Anne Boleyn, he certainly strongly disliked her and felt the opposite for Kathryn. He had his natural preferences, but what I mean to say is that his real job lay not in them but as promoting the cause of his own country and certainly religion. Kind of like More did not hate the King and did not hate Anne but hated what they were standing for. And most of Europe looked at Henry with great distaste for having the charges trumped up so he could get rid of the woman he had thrown everything into an uproar over. Chapuys was certainly disgusted over Anne's treatment of Mary, and again, he shared that feeling with a lot of English subjects, as well. What I mean is that the factionism seemed to take on a life of its own back then. You could have dinner with someone and kill them two minutes later. If anything, it surprises me that, as a diplomat, Chapuys wrote in such revealing terms, when most of them were less obvious and just narrarated "facts" (he said, she said), which is what makes his comments so interesting. The contrast then between Chapuys and Pepys is even more interesting, because of their occupations.

Also, Chapuys referring to Anne as "The Concubine" - that was what the Pope called her, too, is it not? And I think Kathryn refused to call her by name, as well. They did not want to dignify her by even referring to her by name because of what had happened to their religion. It's interesting that a lot of people (can't remember who - too early) took on this stance. I will add here, it was Henry who started everything, not Anne. If Chapuys had called him names he would have lost his power as "diplomat"...
Do you find this valuable?    
beardedlady
beardedlady
18. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 9 2009, 9:08 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 9 2009, 9:09 AM EDT
"Concubine" and "putain" were his preferred terms of endearment. :)

But I think what Anne'sCurls was referring to is the fact that Chapuys even admitted in one his letters that no witnesses were brought against Anne at her trial which was the customary procedure for one accused of a crime. Personally, I interpreted his "sympathy" (yes, I agree maybe not the right word) more towards the men that were executed. His exact words were, "without valid proof or confession."
Do you find this valuable?    
TillyT2
TillyT2
19. RE: Yay! Chapuys is back
Mar 9 2009, 11:32 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 9 2009, 11:32 AM EDT
" . What I mean is that the factionism seemed to take on a life of its own back then. You could have dinner with someone and kill them two minutes later.
"
Well put, the stakes for picking the 'wrong' side/cause in those days was incredibly high and it's difficult for us in the society that we exist in today to fully understand this, you took your eye off the 'game' and paid the ultimate price.'
Do you find this valuable?    
2 | Next