Sign in or 

|
QueenAnneBoleyn |
The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 17 2008, 12:56 PM EST
I don't know whether anyone will be interested to say anything about this but I just wondered how so many people can call Anne Boleyn a terrible person for what she did to KOA and Mary and hardly anyone balmes Jane Seymour at all for what she did to Anne.Jane always holds this sweet, innocent and pure image when, in my opinion, what she and her fmaily did to Anne was much worse than what Anne did to KOA. This is just my opinion and I would be very interested to hear others!!! 11 out of 22 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
The_Lady_Alicia |
1. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 17 2008, 1:52 PM EST
I think that by the time Jane caught Henry's eye Anne had already lost him. I always used to think Jane was sly in the way that she basically did what Anne did and kept Henry at arms length but I have kinda changed my opinion of her. If Henry wanted her then she couldn't have refused him for ever. Don't get me wrong im not anti Anne Boleyn but I do think that she manipulated Henry more so than Jane did. Not just in terms of taking him away from Katherine, but in terms of religion, politics etc. And the fact she was quite happy for Henry to treat KOA and Mary the way he did. She was quite vocal in other matters i'm sure she could have persuaded him to treat them a bit better had she chosen to.
13
out of
16 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
angelosdaughter |
2. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 17 2008, 2:13 PM EST
"I don't know whether anyone will be interested to say anything about this but I just wondered how so many people can call Anne Boleyn a terrible person for what she did to KOA and Mary and hardly anyone balmes Jane Seymour at all for what she did to Anne.I know the wiki has been slow lately. I think we covered this on an earlier thread. Henry, not Jane, was simply following a precedent he set with Anne, but with a more final way of ridding himself of the ex-wife. Those who are partisans of Katharine of Aragon dislike Anne for her mistreatment of Mary and even of Katharine, and her arrogance; she was power-mad. Perhaps she herself did not mistreat Katharine and Mary (although she did mistreat Mary on her own), but she had the King's ear and aided, abetted and goaded Henry in his mistreatment of them. Anne was not loved by the people who saw her as the usurper of the righful Queen's place. Jane was not known for being deliberately unkind, as far as I know, even to Anne's adherents or her daughter Elizabeth. Although she could not really help Elizabeth because of Henry's antipathy to his own daughter as the offspring of his late unlamented Queen, she did nothing to harm her. Also, She also urged him even though it made him angry, to a rapprochement with Mary. Who knows what she might have done in time, if she had not died, for Elizabeth? Anne was dead (by Henry's own doing; Jane had nothing to do with it except in the sense that Henry was looking to marry again and had discovered that he had the power to get rid of an inconvenient ex-wife this way) when Henry married Jane, she was not usurping Anne's place. She was seen as rightful Queen, since Katharine of Aragon, whom many saw as the rightful Queen was also dead. Unlike Anne who was married to Henry in a secret ceremony before his marriage to Katharine had been officially declared invalid by his own lackeys, Jane was by any standard eligible to marry a King who was truly single. In effect, Henry was a bigamist when he married Anne, and if anyone had had the grit to oppose him, the validity of his marriage to Anne could have been cast in doubt. ...continued below... 12 out of 16 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
angelosdaughter |
3. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 17 2008, 2:13 PM EST
"I know the wiki has been slow lately. I think we covered this on an earlier thread. Henry, not Jane, was simply following a precedent he set with Anne, but with a more final way of ridding himself of the ex-wife. Those who are partisans of Katharine of Aragon dislike Anne for her mistreatment of Mary and even of Katharine, and her arrogance; she was power-mad. Perhaps she herself did not mistreat Katharine and Mary (although she did mistreat Mary on her own), but she had the King's ear and aided, abetted and goaded Henry in his mistreatment of them. Anne was not loved by the people who saw her as the usurper of the righful Queen's place.Then, Jane became the mother of the long sought son and thus cemented her status as Queen. She died while Henry and his subjects were still in love with her. If Anne had given birth to a son, a lot of her shortcomings might have been forgiven just for that reason. She didn't and they weren't. 6 out of 13 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
funrod6 |
4. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 17 2008, 8:13 PM EST
"I know the wiki has been slow lately. I think we covered this on an earlier thread. Henry, not Jane, was simply following a precedent he set with Anne, but with a more final way of ridding himself of the ex-wife. Those who are partisans of Katharine of Aragon dislike Anne for her mistreatment of Mary and even of Katharine, and her arrogance; she was power-mad. Perhaps she herself did not mistreat Katharine and Mary (although she did mistreat Mary on her own), but she had the King's ear and aided, abetted and goaded Henry in his mistreatment of them. Anne was not loved by the people who saw her as the usurper of the righful Queen's place.I always love and appreciate the way you post with knowledge and a respectful way; I try, I do but sometimes I come off wrong. So I will stay off this one. You worded it beautifully and I can just say....agree'd to everything you said. 7 out of 8 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Jes89 |
5. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 18 2008, 10:46 AM EST
"I don't know whether anyone will be interested to say anything about this but I just wondered how so many people can call Anne Boleyn a terrible person for what she did to KOA and Mary and hardly anyone balmes Jane Seymour at all for what she did to Anne.I don't know much about Jane,who knows me, knows that my favorite wives are katherine and Anne.But i have to say that i don't see nothing wrong with Jane.I think people likes to jugde her because she was not like anne in a lot of ways, but the diferent was Anne, she was ahead of her time, a great woman(that's makes me admire her) but like all of human being, she made mistakes, one of them was treat mary so badly, something that Jane never did, i'm not saying she wouldn't do someday, but she never did.I never saw somethings saying that Jane celebrated Anne's death or said that she would prefer see Anne hanged than recognized her as her mistress, she never did those things.I also don't thing that Jane was a saint, nobody is to me, Jane was a tipical girl of modern age, nothing wrong with that. 4 out of 4 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
lettice |
6. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 18 2008, 5:21 PM EST
"I don't know much about Jane,who knows me, knows that my favorite wives are katherine and Anne.But i have to say that i don't see nothing wrong with Jane.I think people likes to jugde her because she was not like anne in a lot of ways, but the diferent was Anne, she was ahead of her time, a great woman(that's makes me admire her) but like all of human being, she made mistakes, one of them was treat mary so badly, something that Jane never did, i'm not saying she wouldn't do someday, but she never did.I never saw somethings saying that Jane celebrated Anne's death or said that she would prefer see Anne hanged than recognized her as her mistress, she never did those things.I also don't thing that Jane was a saint, nobody is to me, Jane was a tipical girl of modern age, nothing wrong with that."Jane was guided and goaded by her family, who were as power hungry as the Boleyns. Her father & brothers counseled her on how to act with the King once they knew Jane had caught Henry's eye.As a good daughter/sister, Jane did as she was told. In many ways AB was used the same way. Both families were power hungry and both families used the female as a vehicle to get their desired end. 6 out of 7 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Neveleo |
7. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 20 2008, 8:25 AM EST
"I think that by the time Jane caught Henry's eye Anne had already lost him. I always used to think Jane was sly in the way that she basically did what Anne did and kept Henry at arms length but I have kinda changed my opinion of her. If Henry wanted her then she couldn't have refused him for ever. Don't get me wrong im not anti Anne Boleyn but I do think that she manipulated Henry more so than Jane did. Not just in terms of taking him away from Katherine, but in terms of religion, politics etc. And the fact she was quite happy for Henry to treat KOA and Mary the way he did. She was quite vocal in other matters i'm sure she could have persuaded him to treat them a bit better had she chosen to. "KOA had already lost Henry before he was involved with Anne, all the text books say that Henry d already noticed the bible section about marrying your brother's wife, and started to question his marriage, before he met Anne. If he had not divorved KOA for Anne, he would have done so to marry someone else. Henry treatment of KOA and Mary was down to Henry, maybe influenced by Anne, but his actions were not her fault - why do we always blame the women?! And as far as Jane could not refuse Henry forever - I agree, however neither could Anne and surely thats a point! She did however (Anne) refuse him for many years. Jane did not have to wait very long to become Henry's wife, as Anne did. And however badly KOA and Mary were treated, lets not forget they did not lose their heads! I am not saying how they were treated was fair (appalling obviously) and imho KOA was actually the only true queen - I have a great deal of respect and admiration for her, but Anne is not the monster, whore, bitch that many seem to perceive her as. She was in love with Henry Percy and would have married him had it not been for Wolsey stopping it happening. Anne was not a sait, by any means and her 'faults' led to her downfall, but neither was Jane a saint. What irritates me more than anything is how folk on here, and in general, pit the wives against each other. Sure, they all have their good and bad points but none of them deserved the treatment they got. Henry is the villain of the tale, not ANY of the wives. 8 out of 14 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Jes89 |
8. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 20 2008, 3:32 PM EST
"KOA had already lost Henry before he was involved with Anne, all the text books say that Henry d already noticed the bible section about marrying your brother's wife, and started to question his marriage, before he met Anne. If he had not divorved KOA for Anne, he would have done so to marry someone else.Great post Neveleo!!!!!! i don't understand why one wife against the other too... And for more we admire a lot KOA brave heart, AB personality and KP intelligence, i think all the wives were admirable, in their own ways, since they were married with a monster... 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Ciere |
9. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 20 2008, 5:34 PM EST
^Here here. :D Good reply!
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Hever |
10. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 20 2008, 5:41 PM EST
Good post Neveleo!!!
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Tudorprincess |
11. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 20 2008, 5:49 PM EST
"What irritates me more than anything is how folk on here, and in general, pit the wives against each other. Sure, they all have their good and bad points but none of them deserved the treatment they got. Henry is the villain of the tale, not ANY of the wives.Bravo! I also think this. I hope his wives are all around him in his afterlife, united and friends, and are poking him with sticks! 3 out of 4 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Holly2 |
12. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 20 2008, 5:54 PM EST
"Bravo! I also think this.There's certainly plenty of him to poke! What did the guy weigh towards the end of his life? :-D 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
elizabethtudorrose |
13. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 20 2008, 9:40 PM EST
"KOA had already lost Henry before he was involved with Anne, all the text books say that Henry d already noticed the bible section about marrying your brother's wife, and started to question his marriage, before he met Anne. If he had not divorved KOA for Anne, he would have done so to marry someone else.Hi Neveleo, Great statement, I had made a similar one on another thread. But don't forget that Henry VII also used the Leviticus argument before Henry married KOA as it contravened w/cannon law, and forced Henry to swear before a select company of nobles that he doubted the legitimacy of the marriage. Bishops Fischer and ummm, uhh, oh heck! Can't remember his name, but they both agreed that it was considered a sin for Henry to marry Arthur's wife. One of the many reasons that the Spanish marriage was put off for as long as possible. Henry was supposed to marry Katherine when he was 15, but Henry VII brought up Leviticus to stall the marriage. The politics in Spain were rife, and Jauna and Phillip were trying to take Aragon from Ferdinand. Henry VII was a wiley character, and saw the disadvantages of marrying into Spain while a civil war was about to take place. So he played for time to see the outcome. Henry VIII had in turn questioned the marriage after 8 years with no living heir. And again after Mary was born when Fitzroy came and Henry knew he could father sons. So in his mind, he was being punished for a sin by marrying KOA. By now, both bishops mentioned earlier believed Henry's marriage to be a true marriage, and when Henry wanted annulment, they upheld the sanctity of marriage. KOA was the only woman to truly and completely love Henry. The rest were afraid of him. Anne's problem w/Henry is that she did not become a docile person after her marriage, and continued to nag at Henry as she did prior to their marriage. My opinion: All of the women were his wives and queens of England, tho only 2 were crowned. And all suffered for it. Hello Holly, Hever, Funrod and Lettice! Nice to see you all again! I believe Henry weighed well over 400 lbs when he died, possibly closer to 500! Hope you all had a nice summer! Peace, ETR 4 out of 5 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Neveleo |
14. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 21 2008, 5:35 AM EST
Its safe to say that Henry was rather bulbous when he died! Lol. And apparently he smelled real bad due to his leg wound which 'wept'. Poor Katherine Parr- the very thought of getting into bed with Henry at that point in his life sends shivers down my spine - and brings to mind a - how shall I say this? A very unsavoury picture!! LOL!!!
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Neveleo |
15. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 21 2008, 5:40 AM EST
"Hi Neveleo,I agree, but as we now know, Henry liked to change the law to suit himself!! What I am saying is, he wanted out of his marriage to KOA, Anne Boleyn or no Anne Boleyn - and Wolsey was under the impression he would marry a foreign princess. When Henry wanted something, he found a way to get it - however ill founded his reasons. I just unbelieveable to me that the woman he fought for and loved/lusted after fr all those years, he changed so dramatically and had her killed, along with those poor men. And then tried to pretend she had never existed by banning all mention of her. What aly horrible man he was! Do you find this valuable? |
|
elizabethtudorrose |
16. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 21 2008, 9:15 AM EST
"I agree, but as we now know, Henry liked to change the law to suit himself!!Hi Neveleo, And don't forget suppitories!! KP had to come up w/costives for Henry and may even have had to apply them. Tho I would think that his gentlemen, Groom of the Stool, lolol, would do that. And they didn't bathe much then either. It was thought to be bad for you. So, between the rotting leg, the foul breath and Lord knows what 'down under', she had a very hard time indeed! If the Pope had answered Henry's question, what would have happened? Henry asked, was Clement's dispensation valid, and all the Pope had to do was say yes or no. If the Pope had said yes, it's valid, what do you think Henry would have done? Henry still respected Katherine, perhaps even still loved her, tho it was more filial than erotic. If Henry had gotten the answer from the Pope in the beginning, I don't think he'd have married Anne. The 9 years of waiting certainly soured his good nature, but in the beginning, he was depending on the Pope's verdict, and if he'd said yes immediately, I don't think Henry would have gone to the lengths he went thru to get Anne. All the waiting, all the bs and red tape, all hoping that Henry would change his mind, did nothing but shorten his temper and loose his good nature. I think Henry was expecting something spectacular when he bedded Anne, and all he found was another woman in bed. I think some of his passion cooled after he finally had her, but would not admit even to himself that she was no big deal. But when she got pregnant so quickly, his hopes returned. But by then, he'd already broken from the RC church, and made himself the head. The damage was done in all the years of waiting. Since he was head of state as well as the church, his boundaries were limitless, and he could convince his conscience what he did was right, even if it was the opposite of what he did the day before. Peace, ETR 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
LadyNan |
17. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 21 2008, 9:45 AM EST
"I know the wiki has been slow lately. I think we covered this on an earlier thread. Henry, not Jane, was simply following a precedent he set with Anne, but with a more final way of ridding himself of the ex-wife. Those who are partisans of Katharine of Aragon dislike Anne for her mistreatment of Mary and even of Katharine, and her arrogance; she was power-mad. Perhaps she herself did not mistreat Katharine and Mary (although she did mistreat Mary on her own), but she had the King's ear and aided, abetted and goaded Henry in his mistreatment of them. Anne was not loved by the people who saw her as the usurper of the righful Queen's place.This post is very negatively judgemental of Anne Boleyn and incorrect. Jane was very much involved in usurping Anne. It is well known and documented by several historians who quote Ambassador Chapuys as saying that he advised her to drop heavy hints about Anne's heretical leanings in Henry's ear, and to say that the people of England would never accept her as their true Queen. She must say these things in the presence of her supporters, who would all then swear on their allegiance to the King, that she spoke the truth. Jane certainly acted upon this advice, and it had the desired effect upon the King, who was now receptive to criticism of his wife. This combined with the backing of Thomas Cromwell who actually gave up his adjacent rooms to Henry so that the Seymours would have direct access to the King, seperated the King from his wife Anne who was in pregnant confinement at the time. Jane was catholic and wanted the faction that had Princess Mary as their figurehead to be back in power at court so of course she wanted Henry to reconcile with his catholic daughter. As for the english people, not all were happy to see Jane become betrothed to the King while Anne's body was still warm. There was a ballad of derision in the land which Henry wrote about in a letter to Jane for fear she would hear it and be upset, promising to bring the culprit to task. The facts remain that Anne waited 7 years for an annulment of Henry's marriage even though he had officially seperated from her years before whereas Jane was an accomplice to the murder of his wife (and she was his legal wife) and became his new wife in the matter of a couple of months. 5 out of 10 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
elizabethtudorrose |
18. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 21 2008, 9:45 AM EST
"Jane was guided and goaded by her family, who were as power hungry as the Boleyns. Her father & brothers counseled her on how to act with the King once they knew Jane had caught Henry's eye.As a good daughter/sister, Jane did as she was told. In many ways AB was used the same way. Both families were power hungry and both families used the female as a vehicle to get their desired end."Hi Lettice! Well stated. Both women were 'victims' of their families. Anne did what she did because she saw the state of her sister. She was NOT going to become a statistic! And after, saw the opportunity to further her family by pretending to like Henry. And I'm sure daddy and Norfolk had a lot to say to her about it. I'm sure that Anne did come to love Henry, but she was changed as Henry was by the years of waiting. Jane. I like to think of Jane as portrayed by Anne Stallybrass in Six Wives. Meek, gentle, kind. But not a honey scorpion as Anne called her. Jane may not have been well educated, but she was as canny as Anne, and knew her maidenhead was her only value. That she used the same tactics as Anne is true, however, she was more docile than Anne. She modeled herself after KOA, and knew the way to Henry's heart was to be meek and loving. That the Seymour brothers pushed her and told her what to do I don't doubt. But I like to think that she did what she did because she made up her own mind to do it. There was a force of nature within her, and it wasn't all ploy to get Henry and be Queen. Henry went after Jane because she was the opposite of Anne, and more like KOA. Henry wanted a wife like Katherine, not a willful woman. It's too bad that Anne didn't tone down some after she married Henry. She may have lived tho be divorced or annulled. But Henry couldn't countenance another chance of being a bigamist, so he had her executed. If she lived, there would always be doubt about the legitimacy of his marriage to Jane. And he wanted no doubts whatsoever. Henry easily had her condemned for this reason, and also because he was not in love w/her. I think we all have experienced a relationship in our lives where we just got sick of our mate and ended up hating them by things that had been done. Henry just had the power to 'end' it for good. Peace, ETR 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
elizabethtudorrose |
19. RE: The Damnation of Anne Boleyn
Nov 21 2008, 10:19 AM EST
"This post is very negatively judgemental of Anne Boleyn and incorrect. Jane was very much involved in usurping Anne. It is well known and documented by several historians who quote Ambassador Chapuys as saying that he advised her to drop heavy hints about Anne's heretical leanings in Henry's ear, and to say that the people of England would never accept her as their true Queen. She must say these things in the presence of her supporters, who would all then swear on their allegiance to the King, that she spoke the truth. Jane certainly acted upon this advice, and it had the desired effect upon the King, who was now receptive to criticism of his wife. This combined with the backing of Thomas Cromwell who actually gave up his adjacent rooms to Henry so that the Seymours would have direct access to the King, seperated the King from his wife Anne who was in pregnant confinement at the time.Hello Lady Nan, I think you're both right and wrong on your reply about Anne and Jane. Jane would have made a very formidable Queen had she lived. And Jane had sense, tho ill educated. She did try to get Henry to bring back the monasteries and the church after the Lincoln uprising and then the Pilgrimage of Grace. It only took that one instance of Henry's anger w/her for mixing in w/his politics to keep her in hand. She never argued w/him again, and knew her place. Even tho she was forced to take the Oath, she believed in her heart that Henry's marriage to KOA legal and Mary legitimate. That's why she did all she could to bring Mary back to court. You believe she was an accomplice to Anne's murder? Somehow, I just don't countenance that. I don't think she desired the death of a woman just to become queen. That her family pushed her there's no doubt, but I think Jane did what she believed was right despite being told what to say. In the end, she made up her own mind on how to get Henry and didn't necessarily follow all she was told to say and do. By this time, Henry was blaming Anne for all the beheadings and the disasters in England. It rained for months and no crops grew, which was blamed on Anne by both king and country. When Anne was finally brought to the scaffold, those who had previously hated her had changed their minds and thought that her death was wrong. Everyone knew it was Henry, not Jane, who wanted Anne dead. If the fatal miscarriage had come to term, Anne would have stayed Queen, provided the boy had lived. And had he lived, Anne may have had a chance to produce more heirs. And had Jane lived, she may well have been divorced also. There was rumor that Henry was getting tired of her. I think that Edward would have saved Jane had she lived. But if Edward were a girl..., I don't know if she'd have lasted as his wife. Peace, ETR 5 out of 7 found this valuable. Do you? |