Location: Sir Thomas More

Discussion: Question about Thomos MoreReported This is a featured thread

Showing 1 - 20 of 45  |  Show  posts at a time
2 3 | Next

RoyalMarie00
Question about Thomos More
Aug 18 2008, 1:44 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 18 2008, 1:44 PM EDT
I am starting read more about him since seeing the character in the series. My question did King Henry feel as much gulit as about More death as he did in the series.

Thanks :)
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
queen_elizabeth_1533
queen_elizabeth_1533
1. RE: Question about Thomos More
Aug 18 2008, 5:07 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 18 2008, 5:07 PM EDT
I would think so. They were pretty good friends, and especially after Anne Boleyn fell from power, he probably would have regretted what he had done. Although Thomas More was a problem, because he wouldn't accept the Acts of Supremacy and Succession, he was generally quiet about it, and he was a good person, so I'm sure at some point he would have felt bad about it. Do you find this valuable?    

RoyalMarie00
2. RE: Question about Thomos More
Aug 18 2008, 5:48 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 18 2008, 5:48 PM EDT
Thanks so much I am sorry I read back my post and relized had alot grammar mistakes. This what I meant to write.


I am starting read more about him since seeing the character in the series. My question is diKing Henry feel as much gulit as about More's death as he did in the series?
Do you find this valuable?    
MsSquirrly
MsSquirrly
3. RE: Question about Thomos More
Aug 18 2008, 5:53 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 18 2008, 5:53 PM EDT
"I am starting read more about him since seeing the character in the series. My question did King Henry feel as much gulit as about More death as he did in the series.

Thanks :)"
In a book on More written a couple of generations after his death, it was reported that Henry angrily told Anne that she was the cause of his death, however this period of time was so overshadowed by the polarizing of catholics against protestants & vice versa that its hard to know if it was true or an embroidery to make it look like Anne was the cause of all ills that happened during this time. Henry managed to have over 70,000 people excuted during his tenure - without Anne's influence.

It is also questionable that More and Henry were good friends in actual fact since More showed some dislike for the king to his son in law and the fact that More was from common stock makes it unlikely that they were "good buddies". However, More helped Henry write his book "defense of the seven sacraments" so I think he held Thomas More in some regard and respect but when it came down to it, Henry wanted him to recognize him as head of the church and it was disobediance in Henry's eyes when he wouldnt bend to his will. So he may have been upset at More's execution but I doubt he felt guilt.
4  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
coronation
coronation
4. RE: Question about Thomos More
Aug 18 2008, 6:08 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 18 2008, 6:08 PM EDT
Do you think Henry wouldnt have been good friends with More because he was from common stock? Wasnt Wowsey fairly commen too?? Do you find this valuable?    
MsSquirrly
MsSquirrly
5. RE: Question about Thomos More
Aug 18 2008, 6:16 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 18 2008, 6:16 PM EDT
"Do you think Henry wouldnt have been good friends with More because he was from common stock? Wasnt Wowsey fairly commen too?? "
Yes Wolsey was also from common stock and Henry was not averse to having commoners who were very capable men fill positions in his court. DId it mean that he spent a lot of time with them apart from state business? Doubtful. As I said, I believe he had regard & respect for More but that doesn't make him a "good" friend. There were others that filled those shoes....like Charles Brandon, Henry Norris & to some extent Thomas Wyatt. (all upper class gentlemen)
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
heverhoney
heverhoney
6. RE: Question about Thomos More
Aug 18 2008, 11:01 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 18 2008, 11:01 PM EDT
"In a book on More written a couple of generations after his death, it was reported that Henry angrily told Anne that she was the cause of his death, however this period of time was so overshadowed by the polarizing of catholics against protestants & vice versa that its hard to know if it was true or an embroidery to make it look like Anne was the cause of all ills that happened during this time. Henry managed to have over 70,000 people excuted during his tenure - without Anne's influence.

It is also questionable that More and Henry were good friends in actual fact since More showed some dislike for the king to his son in law and the fact that More was from common stock makes it unlikely that they were "good buddies". However, More helped Henry write his book "defense of the seven sacraments" so I think he held Thomas More in some regard and respect but when it came down to it, Henry wanted him to recognize him as head of the church and it was disobediance in Henry's eyes when he wouldnt bend to his will. So he may have been upset at More's execution but I doubt he felt guilt. "
In the series Henry mentioned reading More's book Utopia. Are there any sources that discuss the historical Henry reading More's works or any thoughts that he might have had in reference to his writings?
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
dorinda.gear
dorinda.gear
7. RE: Question about Thomas More
Sep 15 2008, 4:29 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 4:29 PM EDT
Given the way in which Henry VIII's wives were treated, and the kind of lusty madness/meaness he descended into, I have to say that while I'd like to think he'd feel a bit guilty about it, I suspect that he was more of a tyrant than that - or perhaps that's just the way I can justify what happened to More.

I studied him at Uni last semester, and despite him not being perfect, I had really come to admire the man, so it was utterly heartbreaking to watch his execution. Jeremy Northam acted his role brilliantly; to the point where if I saw him in the street I might have to stop myself running up and hugging him just because he's alive! Then, of course, I'll realise that he's just an actor...I cried buckets, though, I tell you.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Holly2
Holly2
8. RE: Question about Thomos More
Sep 15 2008, 4:46 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 4:46 PM EDT
"I am starting read more about him since seeing the character in the series. My question did King Henry feel as much gulit as about More death as he did in the series.

Thanks :)"
I'd say that Henry blamed More for More's execution, rather than himself. From his perspective, More had every opportunity to take the Oath so if he chose not to do so, he had only himself to blame.
2  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
9. RE: Question about Thomas More
Sep 15 2008, 11:40 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 11:40 PM EDT
"Given the way in which Henry VIII's wives were treated, and the kind of lusty madness/meaness he descended into, I have to say that while I'd like to think he'd feel a bit guilty about it, I suspect that he was more of a tyrant than that - or perhaps that's just the way I can justify what happened to More.

I studied him at Uni last semester, and despite him not being perfect, I had really come to admire the man, so it was utterly heartbreaking to watch his execution. Jeremy Northam acted his role brilliantly; to the point where if I saw him in the street I might have to stop myself running up and hugging him just because he's alive! Then, of course, I'll realise that he's just an actor...I cried buckets, though, I tell you."
Me tooooooooooooo!!! What a great actor!
Do you find this valuable?    
funrod6
funrod6
10. RE: Question about Thomos More
Sep 15 2008, 11:47 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 11:47 PM EDT
"I'd say that Henry blamed More for More's execution, rather than himself. From his perspective, More had every opportunity to take the Oath so if he chose not to do so, he had only himself to blame."
Again Im going to respectfully disagree with Both you and Ms....

First in almost all historical books that I have read it is true that More really did not think of Henry as his best buddy. More felt best at home with his wife and children. Henry sought out a friendship with More because he respected his knowledge on many things of interest to the King. He would call for him at all hours of the day and night. And More obligied ever the servant to the King. More did not take the Oath because it went against his religious beliefs and to do so would be going against God in his eyes. He however did make an attempt to just live quietly away and not bring up the matter. But It was Henrys ego that this person he held in high regard (even if he was of common stock!) would not declare the oath. Even when his family begged him, he was a faithful servant to God first before the King. Placing blame like that to say More died because it was his own fault is like saying its Annes fault she couldnt shut her mouth and produce a male heir.
Do you find this valuable?    
Holly2
Holly2
11. RE: Question about Thomos More
Sep 16 2008, 7:46 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 16 2008, 7:46 AM EDT
"Again Im going to respectfully disagree with Both you and Ms....

First in almost all historical books that I have read it is true that More really did not think of Henry as his best buddy. More felt best at home with his wife and children. Henry sought out a friendship with More because he respected his knowledge on many things of interest to the King. He would call for him at all hours of the day and night. And More obligied ever the servant to the King. More did not take the Oath because it went against his religious beliefs and to do so would be going against God in his eyes. He however did make an attempt to just live quietly away and not bring up the matter. But It was Henrys ego that this person he held in high regard (even if he was of common stock!) would not declare the oath. Even when his family begged him, he was a faithful servant to God first before the King. Placing blame like that to say More died because it was his own fault is like saying its Annes fault she couldnt shut her mouth and produce a male heir."
I think you need to reread the post. From HENRY's perspective, More had only himself to blame. Not from MINE. Since when does anybody expect Henry's logic to be reasonable?
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
coronation
coronation
12. RE: Question about Thomos More
Sep 16 2008, 7:46 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 16 2008, 7:46 AM EDT
That is true from Henrys perspective Anne should have just kept quiet and given him a son and when she didnt...the rest is history. Are we all going to quote Henryp point of view now lol! 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Holly2
Holly2
13. RE: Question about Thomos More
Sep 16 2008, 7:50 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 16 2008, 7:50 AM EDT
"That is true from Henrys perspective Anne should have just kept quiet and given him a son and when she didnt...the rest is history. Are we all going to quote Henryp point of view now lol!"
The original poster asked about Henry's guilt over More's death, so Henry's POV is certainly relevant to this question.

If the question had been SHOULD Henry have felt guilt over More's death, it would be a question for posters' personal opinions on the rights and wrongs of the situation.
2  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
coronation
coronation
14. RE: Question about Thomos More
Sep 16 2008, 8:02 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 16 2008, 8:02 AM EDT
How does anyone really know what Henrys POV was about Mores death?? How do you know that he thought it was Mores own fault-just curious?? Do you find this valuable?    
Holly2
Holly2
15. RE: Question about Thomos More
Sep 16 2008, 8:15 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 16 2008, 8:15 AM EDT
"How does anyone really know what Henrys POV was about Mores death?? How do you know that he thought it was Mores own fault-just curious??"
I don't know. As you say, nobody can.

However, based on the impression of Henry's character I've got from reading up on him over the past sixteen years or so, I think that he was a man who could convince himself of whatever he wanted to convince himself of, and that he would have viewed the Oath of Succession as a test of loyalty. Did people side with their King or with others? My opinion is that he saw himself as making it easy for people to prove their loyalty, it'd only take a minute to take the Oath and then their loyalty would be a matter of record. So, when he's made it so "easy" for them, if they're refusing, he'd be ticked off.

As a defence mechanism, he wouldn't be able to blame himself for More's death so I would say that he initially blamed More. It was a battle of wills between the two of them and Henry lost. He wasn't able to make More side with him.

In later years, Anne probably inherited the role of scapegoat.
2  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
16. RE: Question about Thomos More
Sep 16 2008, 10:05 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 16 2008, 10:05 AM EDT
"I think you need to reread the post. From HENRY's perspective, More had only himself to blame. Not from MINE. Since when does anybody expect Henry's logic to be reasonable?"
I read it wrong I thought you were referring to your thoughts.
1  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
17. RE: Question about Thomos More
Sep 16 2008, 10:10 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 16 2008, 10:10 AM EDT
"I don't know. As you say, nobody can.

However, based on the impression of Henry's character I've got from reading up on him over the past sixteen years or so, I think that he was a man who could convince himself of whatever he wanted to convince himself of, and that he would have viewed the Oath of Succession as a test of loyalty. Did people side with their King or with others? My opinion is that he saw himself as making it easy for people to prove their loyalty, it'd only take a minute to take the Oath and then their loyalty would be a matter of record. So, when he's made it so "easy" for them, if they're refusing, he'd be ticked off.

As a defence mechanism, he wouldn't be able to blame himself for More's death so I would say that he initially blamed More. It was a battle of wills between the two of them and Henry lost. He wasn't able to make More side with him.

In later years, Anne probably inherited the role of scapegoat."
Also the poster poses an open ended question making it only ones actual opinions on what Henry felt, Since nobody really knows. We base much of our conclusions on historical information, or personal opinion. And since Henry often never took the blame for what he did and in this case making it Annes fault (not just an opinion here but historical evidence to support) I stand by my original post. replying to disagree with personal opinions on it,
1  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
18. RE: Question about Thomos More
Sep 16 2008, 10:43 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 16 2008, 10:43 AM EDT
"How does anyone really know what Henrys POV was about Mores death?? How do you know that he thought it was Mores own fault-just curious??"
I think a new book is coming out A daughters love about his daughter.....I need to look it up and see when it comes out. And what its about I really would like to get that book.
Do you find this valuable?    
Boudica
Boudica
19. RE: Question about Thomos More
Sep 16 2008, 10:49 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 16 2008, 10:49 AM EDT
"I think a new book is coming out A daughters love about his daughter.....I need to look it up and see when it comes out. And what its about I really would like to get that book."
It's by John Guy a truely venerable Tudor historian. You can read more about Guy's opinions on More on his website, where he lists a bunch of his articles and undergrad lectures, they are all really good.
http://www.tudors.org/
Do you find this valuable?    
2 3 | Next

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)