Location: Episode 2.10

Discussion: The Juxaposition of Anne and JaneReported This is a featured thread

Showing 61 - 80 of 178  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last
howardfan
howardfan
60. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 14 2008, 11:49 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 14 2008, 11:49 PM EDT
" I've noticed that the same juxtaposition between Anne and Jane was captured in the 1933 film, "The Private Life of Henry VIII". Jane is shown eagerly preparing for marriage while Anne is shown soberly and resolutely preparing for her execution."
yes but i viewed that 1933 movie as a bit of send up really, and in quite bad taste, catherine of aragon was not even in the movie, and Anne boleyn was hardly in the film for more that ten minutes, however merle oberon was electirc as anne, for that breif time, she was nominated for an award
I cant say that the rest of the movie was anything great

anne of cleves was portrayed so OTT, funny but insensitive, alas it was 1933, predjudice and racism was rampent in tv movies and the world did not know the word P.C

but yes Strickland beleives jane was to be celebrating on the day of annes execution as anne did when KOA was sent to exile
Strickland inspired many authors such as weir and fraser, but then again her information according to starkey, was not completely accurate
1  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
LNor19
LNor19
61. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 12:51 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 12:51 AM EDT
"yes but i viewed that 1933 movie as a bit of send up really, and in quite bad taste, catherine of aragon was not even in the movie"
The director or someone associated with the film said that "Katherine of Aragon was too good of a woman for this film." and that's why she was not in the film.
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
desilee
desilee
62. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 1:07 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 1:07 AM EDT
That I agree with...all women were groomed for the families to further there fortunes. The children of royalty are made to believe, in their time, that this is what they are born to do. It was their duties to do this for the family. Do you find this valuable?    
Jes89
Jes89
63. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 11:52 AM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 11:52 AM EDT
"The director or someone associated with the film said that "Katherine of Aragon was too good of a woman for this film." and that's why she was not in the film."
Lnor19
really???
wow so beautiful what he said *.*
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
64. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 12:06 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 12:06 PM EDT
"yes but i viewed that 1933 movie as a bit of send up really, and in quite bad taste, catherine of aragon was not even in the movie, and Anne boleyn was hardly in the film for more that ten minutes, however merle oberon was electirc as anne, for that breif time, she was nominated for an award
I cant say that the rest of the movie was anything great

anne of cleves was portrayed so OTT, funny but insensitive, alas it was 1933, predjudice and racism was rampent in tv movies and the world did not know the word P.C

but yes Strickland beleives jane was to be celebrating on the day of annes execution as anne did when KOA was sent to exile
Strickland inspired many authors such as weir and fraser, but then again her information according to starkey, was not completely accurate"
Howardfan

Was Jane celebrating the upcoming marriage to Henry or Annes death. That isa big difference. Anne was already married to Henry and KOA had been kicked to the curb. So celebrating her horrific sad lonely death was disgusting. For both Henry and Anne. I believe Janes celebration was that of becoming a Queen, not that AB was having her head chopped off.
3  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
65. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 12:08 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 12:08 PM EDT
"yes but i viewed that 1933 movie as a bit of send up really, and in quite bad taste, catherine of aragon was not even in the movie, and Anne boleyn was hardly in the film for more that ten minutes, however merle oberon was electirc as anne, for that breif time, she was nominated for an award
I cant say that the rest of the movie was anything great

anne of cleves was portrayed so OTT, funny but insensitive, alas it was 1933, predjudice and racism was rampent in tv movies and the world did not know the word P.C

but yes Strickland beleives jane was to be celebrating on the day of annes execution as anne did when KOA was sent to exile
Strickland inspired many authors such as weir and fraser, but then again her information according to starkey, was not completely accurate"
that is unless she truly believed the trumped up charges. Which many people did believe. If the King say it so then it was so. Not that I believe that. But that was a different time. I dont think the rest of England was celebrating KOA dying actually many in a state of mourning. And with Anne, her position of Queen with the people was always questionable.

Many people only signed the oath so as not to be killed.
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
Boudica
Boudica
66. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 1:52 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 1:52 PM EDT
"that is unless she truly believed the trumped up charges. "
Even if Jane had doubts (which I believe she must have, after all she served Anne and would know first hand if Anne was truely an adulteress) I'm sure she didn't question them. Not only would it be to her advantage, but it was as you said, the King's word against Anne's. And Anne clearly lost.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Neveleo
Neveleo
67. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 6:36 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 6:36 PM EDT
"I was shouting, I dont think except emphasizing the word QUEEN. And Anne was just as much a player of being a political pawn. And you know what else really makes me have no favor for her at all is that her own sister slept with him. And if she was at all religious she would know that in the eyes of god how sinful her actions and Henrys were.
But welcome to the wiki it seems we have alot of "new: Anne supporters"
Why do you so strongly believe that Jane was so much more saintful than Anne? Just curious? Anne offered an olive branch to Mary which was refused. It was easier for Jane to extend the hand of friendship as KOA had passed away. For Anne to become queen it was tragic what happened to KOA, but for Jane to become queen Anne had to be murdered. I know which believe to be the worst sin there! It just annoys me that Anne is cast by many as the evil lustful one, and Jane viewed as a saint. As I said - why? Give some example of how this is the case! My main reason for supporting Anne is that she was wrongfully executed - as I said, she was murdered, and Jane had a part to play in that, she wasn't totally innocent! However evil some people may percive Anne to have been surely no-one can argue that she deserved to die for her 'sins'?
2  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
68. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 6:59 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 6:59 PM EDT
"Why do you so strongly believe that Jane was so much more saintful than Anne? Just curious? Anne offered an olive branch to Mary which was refused. It was easier for Jane to extend the hand of friendship as KOA had passed away. For Anne to become queen it was tragic what happened to KOA, but for Jane to become queen Anne had to be murdered. I know which believe to be the worst sin there! It just annoys me that Anne is cast by many as the evil lustful one, and Jane viewed as a saint. As I said - why? Give some example of how this is the case! My main reason for supporting Anne is that she was wrongfully executed - as I said, she was murdered, and Jane had a part to play in that, she wasn't totally innocent! However evil some people may percive Anne to have been surely no-one can argue that she deserved to die for her 'sins'? "
Let me give you my personal opinion and its just that an opinion. First lets address KOA. I feel like Im beating a dead horse with this issue. But she was married to Henry for over 20 years. And when he married her he did not have to. He wanted to. For the much of their marriage they were happy. And he doted on his daughter. Once KOA was no longer to give him his male heir she was of no use to him. He went looking for someone to give him that. Anne caught his eye. For many reasons. He was strongly attracted to Anne that his family no longer mattered. Anne withheld sex. Using that as the biggest play of this chess game ever. Driving Henry crazy with lust. And she was HORRIBLE to KOA and Mary. I believe she used the sex card to help Henry see things in a new light. A new reformation. And gave him the words needed to become KIng of his own Church and ruler. I can say I feel bad for Anne that she died for false charges. But I hardly find her a heroine because of it. I think its tragic. But I also find much disgust in the way she was with KOA and Mary. Especially Mary. Also who woild want to lay with a man who slept with their own sister. And I find that Father Boleyn would prostitute his daughters to advance himself.
And then when she delighted in KOA death, again made me sick.

Now for Jane. First Jane was a little different. Some things similar. Jane was very much a pawn for her family. However she did not have the intelect that Anne did. Anne was equally powerful in wanting position. Jane may never recognized Anne as queen but a mistress. And since KOA was now dead she was free to marry Henry - based once again on Henrys rules. She brought Mary back to the KINGS good graces. Something Anne was too selfish to do. You say she made an attempt. No she did not. She used a baragaining tool and said call me your Queen and you can be brought back to daddy. Disgusting behavior. Insecure. Jealous. Not my type of heroine. The only thing I find remotely admirable
6  out of 8 found this valuable. Do you?    
Neveleo
Neveleo
69. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 7:30 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 7:30 PM EDT
But Jane did not need to ask Mary to call her queen, Mary did so becauise her mother had passed. I just don't buy that Jane was as sweet and innocent as she is often portrayed..sorry! Yes she was a pawn of her family but so was Anne. How do you know Jane did not want position??
I also support KOA and yes she was treated appallingly, but by HENRY, not Anne. None of her treatment could have happened if it were not for him, but Anne haters blame her, as they did in the actual time it happened.
An all too familiar story, the women get the blame!
I am not hating Jane, or KOA or any of Henry's other wives, its just that I find Anne's story very tragic, particularly in light of the fact that with hindsight she was a very signifiant historical figure, and because of her England was changed forever. King Henry lusted after her, but as soon as he tired of her and did not get a son from her (her fault of course) he was swift to move on - don't forget Jane and he married just 11 days after her execution, I call that rather disgusting or was meek Jane just complying??!
Ironic really that we now know its the man's sperm that determines the sex of the baby...
1  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
liv_forever
liv_forever
70. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 7:44 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 7:44 PM EDT
My opinion is that Anne was a strong, independent woman who was fiesty and intelligent. A woman like this would not get pushed around by her family. Thats why so many people admire her! So i do not believe that Anne was pushed into marrying Henry. I believe she did it out of choice (and im not condemning her for it).

Jane, on the other hand, was an obedient daughter who wasn't educated and never did anything out of turn. She's the sort of girl who seems easy to manipulate, especially by her own family. It seems to me that she was probably acting out of duty to her family, who we all know were very cunning, ruthless and ambitious.

This is one reason why SOME Anne B fans irritate me. I don't believe that this powerful, independent and brave woman like they say Anne was, could be pushed around into doing something that she didnt want to do. To me, its either one or the other. An independent woman or a victim. You can't have it both ways. This is just honest opinion.
5  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
Neveleo
Neveleo
71. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 8:12 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 8:12 PM EDT
"My opinion is that Anne was a strong, independent woman who was fiesty and intelligent. A woman like this would not get pushed around by her family. Thats why so many people admire her! So i do not believe that Anne was pushed into marrying Henry. I believe she did it out of choice (and im not condemning her for it).

Jane, on the other hand, was an obedient daughter who wasn't educated and never did anything out of turn. She's the sort of girl who seems easy to manipulate, especially by her own family. It seems to me that she was probably acting out of duty to her family, who we all know were very cunning, ruthless and ambitious.

This is one reason why SOME Anne B fans irritate me. I don't believe that this powerful, independent and brave woman like they say Anne was, could be pushed around into doing something that she didnt want to do. To me, its either one or the other. An independent woman or a victim. You can't have it both ways. This is just honest opinion. "
Hi liv forever
Very well put and for the most part I agree. I doubt Anne would have let herself be pushed into a marriage - although she was forced to abandon her plans to marry Henry Percy - men had all the power those days!
I do disagree however with the statement that she cannot be an independent woman and a victom. She certainly was for her time an independent woman, but in the end, and probbaly partly due to her independence which Henry initially found so attractive, she was a victim. Her feistiness which Henry initially found so attractive seemed to annoy and disgust him in the end - he chose to refer to it as witchcraft! Which is why I believe he went for someone so opposite in character to her. Her death was, love her or hate her, tragic - but hisotry tells us she faced it bravely which I again admire her for - and she never said anything against the king (although she probably had the welfare of her daughter in mind apart from anything else!). I think all of Henry's wives were victims in one way shape or form, other than Katherine Parr who had a narrow escape! All the victims of a selfish spoilt brat who happened to rule England!
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
coronation
coronation
72. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 8:22 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 8:22 PM EDT
"
- don't forget Jane and he married just 11 days after her execution, I call that rather disgusting or was meek Jane just complying??!
Ironic really that we now know its the man's sperm that determines the sex of the baby..."
Yes Jane married Henry 11 days after Annes execution, you could say that was in bad taste but I am sure Henry had the date set and Jane complied, . I think its disgusting the way Henry and Anne celebrated Katherines death,to me that was very bad taste. How must Mary have felt when she heard her father and Anne had behaved like that? I thi k its admirable the way Jane brought Mary back to court and that it wass very brave of her to have Elizabeth at Edwards christening, I am sure she must have gone out of her way for Henry to allow it. Knowing the way he felt about Anne, none could even say her name to him .
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Neveleo
Neveleo
73. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 8:34 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 8:34 PM EDT
"Yes Jane married Henry 11 days after Annes execution, you could say that was in bad taste but I am sure Henry had the date set and Jane complied, . I think its disgusting the way Henry and Anne celebrated Katherines death,to me that was very bad taste. How must Mary have felt when she heard her father and Anne had behaved like that? I thi k its admirable the way Jane brought Mary back to court and that it wass very brave of her to have Elizabeth at Edwards christening, I am sure she must have gone out of her way for Henry to allow it. Knowing the way he felt about Anne, none could even say her name to him . "
Since Jane was close to death at the time of Edward's christening, I doubt she fought for anyone to attend! I take no pleasure from saying that but its the truth. I just don't get the 'all hail st Jane' view. One minute Jane is brave for doing things, next she is just complying.??? For example - She was brave for having Elizabeth and Mary at the christening, but not brave enough to suggest 11 days was maybe in ill taste???? Sorry but she's my least favourite of all his wives and yes, this is probably due to the fact that I'm such an Anne fan! In terms of reuniting Henry with his daughters, Katherine Parr was responsible for much of that.
I often wonder whether Henry thought of Anne after her death, you know, in light of the fact that as you say, noone could mention her name??? Maybe it was easiest for him to pretend she'd never existed - you know, seeing as how he had murdered her!!
Do you find this valuable?    
coronation
coronation
74. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 8:57 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 8:57 PM EDT
It was actually after Edwards christening when Jane fell ill so therefore she would have arranged for Elizabeth to attend beforehand . Yes Katherine Parr was responsible for reuniting Henry with his daughters but I think considering how short a time Jane had she did pretty well it must have been really hard to broach the subject of haveing Elizabeth at the christening with Henry. People seem to forget poor Jane wasnt around for long so we will never have the chance to see what she could have done.

I think Henry was horrible for what he did to Anne, but I dont know if it would have bothered him too much considering how selfish he was. No doubt he put her execution to the back of his mind like Thomas Mores.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
liv_forever
liv_forever
75. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 8:58 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 8:58 PM EDT
I don't think i explained myself very well when i said that Anne couldn't be an independent woman and a victim. I meant at the beginning of the relationship with Henry, where she had the choice to go after him or not. I regard that people who are forced to do something.,are victims, whilst those who chose, are independent. That is why i can't ever think of Anne as both in that situation. She was known for being independent and strong, so therefore she wouldnt get pushed into something she didnt want to. But of course she was a victim after she married Henry, there's no denying that. He fell out of love with her and accused her of some of the most disgusting and depraved things imaginable, and that's truly unforgivable and unfair. Like you said, all his wives were victims.

I know i can't change your mind about Jane, once you have your mind set to something it is often hard to change it (i'm exactly the same lol), but with the example you gave, being able to have Elizabeth at the christening but not have the wedding delayed, is simply because by the time of the christening, she had secured her position by having Edward. Before Edward, she had nothing to guarantee her position. She had seen what happened to the other 2 wives and was probably terrified.
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
liv_forever
liv_forever
76. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 9:01 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 9:01 PM EDT
If you have no security and you’re marrying a man like that, you wouldn’t say anything or request anything that would upset or anger him. He wanted to marry her then and there, she had no choice but to comply or face his wrath. Later on she did try and be bold, with the Pilgrimage of Grace, but that annoyed him and she had no son so no security, so she backed down. Now, however, she had a son. Henry would have seen her as a goddess and wouldn’t deny her anything. If she didn’t want Elizabeth there, she wouldn’t have been. But she did, and she managed to persuade Henry too, and he would have probably not been that fond of her at the time. Now that she had secured her place, she could start to voice her opinions more. 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
77. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 9:12 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 9:12 PM EDT
"Let me give you my personal opinion and its just that an opinion. First lets address KOA. I feel like Im beating a dead horse with this issue. But she was married to Henry for over 20 years. And when he married her he did not have to. He wanted to. For the much of their marriage they were happy. And he doted on his daughter. Once KOA was no longer to give him his male heir she was of no use to him. He went looking for someone to give him that. Anne caught his eye. For many reasons. He was strongly attracted to Anne that his family no longer mattered. Anne withheld sex. Using that as the biggest play of this chess game ever. Driving Henry crazy with lust. And she was HORRIBLE to KOA and Mary. I believe she used the sex card to help Henry see things in a new light. A new reformation. And gave him the words needed to become KIng of his own Church and ruler. I can say I feel bad for Anne that she died for false charges. But I hardly find her a heroine because of it. I think its tragic. But I also find much disgust in the way she was with KOA and Mary. Especially Mary. Also who woild want to lay with a man who slept with their own sister. And I find that Father Boleyn would prostitute his daughters to advance himself.
And then when she delighted in KOA death, again made me sick.

Now for Jane. First Jane was a little different. Some things similar. Jane was very much a pawn for her family. However she did not have the intelect that Anne did. Anne was equally powerful in wanting position. Jane may never recognized Anne as queen but a mistress. And since KOA was now dead she was free to marry Henry - based once again on Henrys rules. She brought Mary back to the KINGS good graces. Something Anne was too selfish to do. You say she made an attempt. No she did not. She used a baragaining tool and said call me your Queen and you can be brought back to daddy. Disgusting behavior. Insecure. Jealous. Not my type of heroine. The only thing I find remotely admirable"
Continued...was her last speech.That she gladly die a thousand deaths to save the innocent before her. Im sorry the cont came late.

Its totally ok with me that you dont buy that Jane was sweet and innocent. I dont find her as deceitfull as Anne was. Anne was full of spite. Many times being told to ACT like A QUEEN. Sorry not shouting. So if I use caps sometimes Im too lazy to go back and fix. I actually blame Henry for his actions. But when it comes to calling Anne Boleyn a heroine I just dont feel that way. BTW Ive never said I think Jane to be a heroine. The only one I believe to be one is KOA. As for how soon Jane married Henry, well let's talk about Anne not even being married to Henry and she started wearing Royal colors. And disrepecting the Queen and flaunting it in court. That is why she was gossiped about. That is why she was not as beloved by the people. Now for once second try to see outside the box. Lets look at Jane, she was faithful to her Queen KOA. And MANY catholic supporters never looked at Anne as a Queen. Also remember Henry trumped up charges and the people (for god knows what reason loved him, or feared him) In Janes defense we really dont know what Henry told her. And she could honestly have believed every word that bastard said. Was she a saint, no. But she did not have the vindictive personality of Anne. Now you can feel free to ask me to think outside the box and Im willing to listen, and be open to seeing things different. So far no one has convinced me otherwise.
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
78. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 9:16 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 9:16 PM EDT
"But Jane did not need to ask Mary to call her queen, Mary did so becauise her mother had passed. I just don't buy that Jane was as sweet and innocent as she is often portrayed..sorry! Yes she was a pawn of her family but so was Anne. How do you know Jane did not want position??
I also support KOA and yes she was treated appallingly, but by HENRY, not Anne. None of her treatment could have happened if it were not for him, but Anne haters blame her, as they did in the actual time it happened.
An all too familiar story, the women get the blame!
I am not hating Jane, or KOA or any of Henry's other wives, its just that I find Anne's story very tragic, particularly in light of the fact that with hindsight she was a very signifiant historical figure, and because of her England was changed forever. King Henry lusted after her, but as soon as he tired of her and did not get a son from her (her fault of course) he was swift to move on - don't forget Jane and he married just 11 days after her execution, I call that rather disgusting or was meek Jane just complying??!
Ironic really that we now know its the man's sperm that determines the sex of the baby..."
BTW she had a warm relationship with Jane. I believe it was in Janes nature to nurture Mary and bring her back to her father. And your right her mother had already died. But when Anne was with Henry and her mother was cast aside and Mary brought back to work as nothing more than a servant to her half sister is sad. And for Anne to have the gall to say I will bring you back to your father if you call me Queen. Why the hell would Mary. Her mother was the Queen. Henry broke every rule so he could get laid by Anne in hopes of getting his little boy heir. Didnt happen and so Anne was no more use to him. Annes death is tragic.....the rest no so much. She lived in France. She was well educated.So I dont see her life as tragic, just her death.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
79. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Sep 15 2008, 9:19 PM EDT | Post edited: Sep 15 2008, 9:19 PM EDT
"My opinion is that Anne was a strong, independent woman who was fiesty and intelligent. A woman like this would not get pushed around by her family. Thats why so many people admire her! So i do not believe that Anne was pushed into marrying Henry. I believe she did it out of choice (and im not condemning her for it).

Jane, on the other hand, was an obedient daughter who wasn't educated and never did anything out of turn. She's the sort of girl who seems easy to manipulate, especially by her own family. It seems to me that she was probably acting out of duty to her family, who we all know were very cunning, ruthless and ambitious.

This is one reason why SOME Anne B fans irritate me. I don't believe that this powerful, independent and brave woman like they say Anne was, could be pushed around into doing something that she didnt want to do. To me, its either one or the other. An independent woman or a victim. You can't have it both ways. This is just honest opinion. "
Very well put liv. I love that you can put Anne's strengths into perspective.
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)