Location: Episode 2.10

Discussion: The Juxaposition of Anne and JaneReported This is a featured thread

Showing 21 - 40 of 178  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last
MsSquirrly
MsSquirrly
20. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 4 2008, 2:15 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 4 2008, 2:15 PM EDT
"Truthfully, it was no choice for Katherine. It went against her very being, for Katherine, it was just as bad as death. Mary was bastardized anyway and Katherine was not allowed to see her child, often not knowing her condition. This "choice" that everyone says Katherine had, was in reality, no choice at all to Katherine. Both Katherine and Anne met their fate discarded and heart-broken, and the fate of their daughters in the hands of the man who had caused them both so much pain. "
It may have gone against her pride and her upbringing but it was a choice. Many look at Anne of Cleves as being the smartest wife in the bunch because she did agree to take the title of "King's sister" being installed in a couple of royal mansions & given enough financially to support herself without the need of a husband. Living longer than any of the wives in relative comfort.

Katherine was past childbearing and knew that Henry was desperate for a son. If she had agreed to retire from court....Henry would have assured she lived a comfortable life the same as Anne of Cleves. As Holly said, above, her daughter could still have been recognized as legitimate. So it was definitely an option. Her pride would not let her take it however,

Anne Boleyn on the other hand was dispatched much quicker and without any options. She was judicially murdered on completely bogus charges. Katherine had a number of years to get used to her option and make the best of it and she chose not to.

(and now I am going to duck while the pro KoA muster up LOL)
7  out of 11 found this valuable. Do you?    
Tudorprincess
Tudorprincess
21. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 4 2008, 2:23 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 4 2008, 2:23 PM EDT
"You bring up a very good point and of course none of us know for sure about someone's intelligence if we have never met someone. However, historically, there is no mention of Jane's "great wit" and she was at court as long as Anne. She wasn't new to court. She had been lady in waiting to Katherine of Aragon before Anne. All those years, she was not mentioned as being "outstanding" in anyway. Anne on the other hand was known as outstanding from the time she went to the French court as a young girl.

Even Anne's nemisis Thomas Cromwell said she was a woman of " intelligence, spirit and courage" The same cannot be said of Jane. So all we have to go on is the words of the few that knew her. Anne was known as being erudite and enjoyed discusssions about religion with her group of courtiers. She was known for her music, her poetry & her style. Jane was known for her needlework &b knowledge of housekeeping. Now it may be a leap to say she was more intelligent but somehow I think not.


"
I think Anne was more 'book smart' and Jane was 'street smart'. She had seen the workings of the court and knew how to act and when to keep quiet. She learnt from her predecessors's mistakes. I love Anne's intelligence and Jane's good common sense!
8  out of 10 found this valuable. Do you?    
BF1964
BF1964
22. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 4 2008, 3:37 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 4 2008, 3:37 PM EDT
"You bring up a very good point and of course none of us know for sure about someone's intelligence if we have never met someone. However, historically, there is no mention of Jane's "great wit" and she was at court as long as Anne. She wasn't new to court. She had been lady in waiting to Katherine of Aragon before Anne. All those years, she was not mentioned as being "outstanding" in anyway. Anne on the other hand was known as outstanding from the time she went to the French court as a young girl.

Even Anne's nemisis Thomas Cromwell said she was a woman of " intelligence, spirit and courage" The same cannot be said of Jane. So all we have to go on is the words of the few that knew her. Anne was known as being erudite and enjoyed discusssions about religion with her group of courtiers. She was known for her music, her poetry & her style. Jane was known for her needlework &b knowledge of housekeeping. Now it may be a leap to say she was more intelligent but somehow I think not.


"
Anne was educated at the French court and apparently was a woman of some substantial learning. Jane, by comparison, could barely read and write. True, formal education isn't always an indication of true intelligence, but in comparing Anne and Jane, I would think Anne's worldliness, coupled with her ability to read, understand and discuss various forms of literature, including philosophy and religion, would obviously make her more interesting than Jane. Anne had seen the world, she knew how to navigate the court, she knew how to gain and keep a man's interest. More importantly she knew her own mind, what she wanted, and what life could be like for a woman with power.
5  out of 8 found this valuable. Do you?    
BF1964
BF1964
23. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 4 2008, 3:47 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 4 2008, 3:47 PM EDT
"It may have gone against her pride and her upbringing but it was a choice. Many look at Anne of Cleves as being the smartest wife in the bunch because she did agree to take the title of "King's sister" being installed in a couple of royal mansions & given enough financially to support herself without the need of a husband. Living longer than any of the wives in relative comfort.

Katherine was past childbearing and knew that Henry was desperate for a son. If she had agreed to retire from court....Henry would have assured she lived a comfortable life the same as Anne of Cleves. As Holly said, above, her daughter could still have been recognized as legitimate. So it was definitely an option. Her pride would not let her take it however,

Anne Boleyn on the other hand was dispatched much quicker and without any options. She was judicially murdered on completely bogus charges. Katherine had a number of years to get used to her option and make the best of it and she chose not to.

(and now I am going to duck while the pro KoA muster up LOL)"
I couldn't agree with you more. KoA's pride was a major force in her own downfall. True, it would be hard to stomach - to be revered as Queen and suffer through so many miscarriages and stillbirths, only to have to some sassy little tart take your place. But history shows Henry could be incredibly gracious and generous to those who bent to his will. As Dowager Princess of Wales KoA would have lead a very comfortable life indeed. KoA's staunch Catholic faith, coupled with her insistence on Mary as future queen, and her own wounded pride, caused her to make some foolish decisions. Ditto with Mary, would could have enjoyed her father's favor and stayed in the succession. Mary's admission to her own illegitamacy and the acknowledgement of her parent's annulment could have been made much earlier, and done her much more good. The daughter took her cues from the mother, and both suffered unnecessarily.
5  out of 9 found this valuable. Do you?    

elle_elle213
24. Why are we blaming the women?
Aug 4 2008, 10:22 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 4 2008, 10:22 PM EDT
It alarms me to read all of these posts making villains of both Jane and Anne, pitting them against each other and making them both out to be these horrible women. My main concern in regards to the show is people's view of Jane. This is a world were power is fought over and for the women of this age, they have NO power but the little education they are given if they are given any at all and their feminine wiles.

Both Jane and Anne were pawns, used so that the men who control their lives could get more power.
Families had to be selfish and their daughters in turn had to be selfish and did not think beyond making a good marriage. No one wanted to be a spinster and to be poor or lower class in this age was not a pleasent life.
Many of you seem to have fallen in love with Anne's character although, in keeping strictly with the show's sequence of events, Anne, not only had no care for the plight of Catherine and Mary, but asked Henry to have them killed. But this was simply to secure herself and her daughter's place in the kingdom. Being a woman in this age was about security.
So knowing this, I take issue with people when they look down upon Jane and make her a villain simply because Showtime, choose to splice two scenes together.
6  out of 9 found this valuable. Do you?    
LNor19
LNor19
25. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 4 2008, 10:47 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 4 2008, 10:47 PM EDT
"It may have gone against her pride and her upbringing but it was a choice. Many look at Anne of Cleves as being the smartest wife in the bunch because she did agree to take the title of "King's sister" being installed in a couple of royal mansions & given enough financially to support herself without the need of a husband. Living longer than any of the wives in relative comfort.

Katherine was past childbearing and knew that Henry was desperate for a son. If she had agreed to retire from court....Henry would have assured she lived a comfortable life the same as Anne of Cleves. As Holly said, above, her daughter could still have been recognized as legitimate. So it was definitely an option. Her pride would not let her take it however,

Anne Boleyn on the other hand was dispatched much quicker and without any options. She was judicially murdered on completely bogus charges. Katherine had a number of years to get used to her option and make the best of it and she chose not to.

(and now I am going to duck while the pro KoA muster up LOL)"
Look at it from Katherine's point-of-view. In that day and age, you lived and died by what the bible and the church taught, to against the teachings was basically spitting on God and the Holy community. Katherine was a very pious woman, very deeply true to her Catholic faith. Now, her husband does everything she has been taught against, she does what she can to protect her faith and what she knows to true, she has not known anything else, she view the Protestants as heretics and therefore their view was not even flicker in her mind.
It was not pride, it was her attempt to save and protect England and those close to her from what she considered to be destroying Europe. Katherine expressed this view many times, she wrote in her last letter about it too, praying for Henry's soul and how she felt his becoming Protestant was something God would have to pardon him for:
"For my part, I pardon you everything, and I wish to devoutly pray God that He will pardon you also."
7  out of 8 found this valuable. Do you?    
Jes89
Jes89
26. RE: Why are we blaming the women?
Aug 4 2008, 10:49 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 4 2008, 10:49 PM EDT
i think i'm the only person that likes as much of KOA as ANNE BOLEYN.
hehehe

i don't know much about Jane, i sympathize with her because she helped Mary, but i think that they could have shown more about Jane seymour's life, as the same way they did with Anne.

5  out of 5 found this valuable. Do you?    
MsSquirrly
MsSquirrly
27. RE: Why are we blaming the women?
Aug 5 2008, 12:08 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 5 2008, 12:08 AM EDT
"i think i'm the only person that likes as much of KOA as ANNE BOLEYN.
hehehe

i don't know much about Jane, i sympathize with her because she helped Mary, but i think that they could have shown more about Jane seymour's life, as the same way they did with Anne.

"
Oh I don't dislike KoA at all. I believe she was an admirable women and always acquitted herself with the dignity of a true royal princess. She couldnt help what happened to her just like Anne couldn't. Neither of them could keep the King for one main factor, they couldn't produce a male heir who would survive. As Brunet said on another thread....they were just women in a male dominated world, doing the best they could. DId they always make the wisest decisions? In retrospect....no.

When it comes to Jane, it is harder to form an opinion because there isn't anything written about her years at court before Henry "noticed" her and she had such a short reign.
5  out of 5 found this valuable. Do you?    

LadyJane1961
28. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 5 2008, 7:38 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 5 2008, 7:38 AM EDT
"Except for the fact that Katherine wasn't about to be murdered."
KATHERINE WAS MURDEERED . EITHER ANN OR HENRY ORDERED CATHERINE TO BE POISENED
3  out of 15 found this valuable. Do you?    
MsSquirrly
MsSquirrly
29. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 5 2008, 8:52 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 5 2008, 8:52 AM EDT
"KATHERINE WAS MURDEERED . EITHER ANN OR HENRY ORDERED CATHERINE TO BE POISENED"
It is thought that she had cancer at her death because her heart was revealed to be blackened. This gave rise to some RUMOURS of poisoning.
7  out of 9 found this valuable. Do you?    
Boudica
Boudica
30. RE: Why are we blaming the women?
Aug 5 2008, 12:13 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 5 2008, 12:13 PM EDT
"It alarms me to read all of these posts making villains of both Jane and Anne, pitting them against each other and making them both out to be these horrible women. My main concern in regards to the show is people's view of Jane. This is a world were power is fought over and for the women of this age, they have NO power but the little education they are given if they are given any at all and their feminine wiles.

Both Jane and Anne were pawns, used so that the men who control their lives could get more power.
Families had to be selfish and their daughters in turn had to be selfish and did not think beyond making a good marriage. No one wanted to be a spinster and to be poor or lower class in this age was not a pleasent life.
Many of you seem to have fallen in love with Anne's character although, in keeping strictly with the show's sequence of events, Anne, not only had no care for the plight of Catherine and Mary, but asked Henry to have them killed. But this was simply to secure herself and her daughter's place in the kingdom. Being a woman in this age was about security.
So knowing this, I take issue with people when they look down upon Jane and make her a villain simply because Showtime, choose to splice two scenes together. "
I'm not in doubt there are some people who dislike Jane (both her character in the series and the historical figure) but from what I read the majority of the posters on this thread are referring to what they saw on episode 2.10 and they are discussing the juxtaposition of Jane with Anne - in other words, the directors and writers decision to portray these historical women NOT the historical women themselves. Watching the episode, Jane is portrayed as joyous and completely uncaring to the horrific fate of her predecessor (it was historically unprecedented for a Queen of England to be executed at that time btw) and that's what most of the users I've read are commenting on.

I think it's important to be clear what we're referring to, the character in the show or the historical figure - because I don't think everybody on this thread thinks Jane is a terrible person I think they believe how the episode portrayed her in that one scene made her out to be a terrible person.

There lies the rub.
7  out of 7 found this valuable. Do you?    
Boudica
Boudica
31. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 5 2008, 12:24 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 5 2008, 12:24 PM EDT
"Look at it from Katherine's point-of-view. In that day and age, you lived and died by what the bible and the church taught, to against the teachings was basically spitting on God and the Holy community. Katherine was a very pious woman, very deeply true to her Catholic faith. Now, her husband does everything she has been taught against, she does what she can to protect her faith and what she knows to true, she has not known anything else, she view the Protestants as heretics and therefore their view was not even flicker in her mind.
It was not pride, it was her attempt to save and protect England and those close to her from what she considered to be destroying Europe. Katherine expressed this view many times, she wrote in her last letter about it too, praying for Henry's soul and how she felt his becoming Protestant was something God would have to pardon him for:
"For my part, I pardon you everything, and I wish to devoutly pray God that He will pardon you also."
"
I can understand why Katherine felt like she had no choice, but in life you always have a choice. However, depending on when in history and where you lived, as a woman, some choices were more "available" than others. For Katherine, the choice of dowager princess was available to her on other people's standards (Henry!), but not her own. That's why she's so admirable to so many people across history, she had a choice but she refused. Henry may call her "stubborn" for it, but she was doing what she believed God created her to be and she was protecting the birth-right of her daughter.
4  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    

elle_elle213
32. RE: Why are we blaming the women?
Aug 5 2008, 12:53 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 5 2008, 12:53 PM EDT
"I'm not in doubt there are some people who dislike Jane (both her character in the series and the historical figure) but from what I read the majority of the posters on this thread are referring to what they saw on episode 2.10 and they are discussing the juxtaposition of Jane with Anne - in other words, the directors and writers decision to portray these historical women NOT the historical women themselves. Watching the episode, Jane is portrayed as joyous and completely uncaring to the horrific fate of her predecessor (it was historically unprecedented for a Queen of England to be executed at that time btw) and that's what most of the users I've read are commenting on.

I think it's important to be clear what we're referring to, the character in the show or the historical figure - because I don't think everybody on this thread thinks Jane is a terrible person I think they believe how the episode portrayed her in that one scene made her out to be a terrible person.

There lies the rub."
I understand that, and in that vein I don't understand why so many people seem to love Anne for being a vivacious, brave, animated person when on the show, she was also manipulative, completely uncaring and cruel when in came to KOA and Mary. Anne was celebrating when she heard the news of Katherine's death, yet people want to slap around Jane for her own excitement about becoming a Queen. And for her excitement I simply pointed out why she would show some girlish joy instead of sitting around mourning her predecessor. Historically Jane saw the fates of the wives before her and thread carefully. I think it is why she seems dull in comparison.
Watching the rise of one Queen and the fall of another is hard, made harder by the intensity brought by Natalie. But, it was not Jane's idea to bring down Anne, she was not placed in front of him as a means for her family to claim power but when it became clear the King had taken an interest in Jane, her family did what was necessary to gain power.

One is no better than the other, no matter what the historical precedent. What Henry put Catherine through, just so he could marry Anne was unheard of too, but Anne didn't seem to lose any sleep on it.
I
7  out of 8 found this valuable. Do you?    
Holly2
Holly2
33. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 5 2008, 2:40 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 5 2008, 2:40 PM EDT
"Look at it from Katherine's point-of-view. In that day and age, you lived and died by what the bible and the church taught, to against the teachings was basically spitting on God and the Holy community. Katherine was a very pious woman, very deeply true to her Catholic faith. Now, her husband does everything she has been taught against, she does what she can to protect her faith and what she knows to true, she has not known anything else, she view the Protestants as heretics and therefore their view was not even flicker in her mind.
It was not pride, it was her attempt to save and protect England and those close to her from what she considered to be destroying Europe. Katherine expressed this view many times, she wrote in her last letter about it too, praying for Henry's soul and how she felt his becoming Protestant was something God would have to pardon him for:
"For my part, I pardon you everything, and I wish to devoutly pray God that He will pardon you also."
"
And yet in the end it was her refusal to yield that indirectly led to England's separation from the papacy.

Had the annulment been granted, I think that Henry's gratitude would have kept him loyal to the pope for quite some time. When the question of an annulment was first broached, Henry wasn't planning on splitting from the papacy and it would be quite some time before Anne brought the forbidden books to his attention, perhaps knowing that in his frustration over the delays and hurdles in getting his annulment, he was going to be in a far more receptive mood than he would have been under other circumstances. Maybe later Katherine was motivated, in part, by a desire to protect the country from separation from the papacy but that would not have been a risk at first.

It's completely understandable that she would not have wanted to see her marriage annulled, I can't blame her for that - even with Mary's legitimacy and status guaranteed, it would still be humiliating for her to be labelled as a woman who had lived in sin, albeit unknowingly, with a man who was not her husband for the best part of twenty years - but the option of joining a convent, and there were quite a few of them where she could enjoy all the comforts she was accustomed to, would have provided her with an honourable "out" from the marriage, freeing Henry. Even the pope was urging her to take this option but she refused.

Had she accepted, a lot of people might have been spared a lot of pain, her daughter included, but, as they say, hindsight is 20-20.
8  out of 13 found this valuable. Do you?    
Holly2
Holly2
34. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 5 2008, 2:45 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 5 2008, 2:45 PM EDT
"KATHERINE WAS MURDEERED . EITHER ANN OR HENRY ORDERED CATHERINE TO BE POISENED"
You are aware, I take it, that modern medical experts have concluded that the discoloration and the growth on Katherine's heart was, in all likelihood, due to cancer rather than to poison, which was blamed in a more ignorant age? And that Katherine was actually so afraid of being poisoned that she was only eating meals cooked by the few loyal servants who remained with her during the last months of her life?

Look at it logically: if Anne or Henry did want Katherine to be poisoned, if they were willing to take that step, don't you think that they'd have done it sooner, when they were living in the same palaces, had more of an opportunity to do so and when they could benefit more from her death? Had Katherine died before Henry and Anne were married, it would have worked out much better for them. Obviously Henry the widower could get married if he wanted to. After Henry's marriage to Katherine was annulled and his marriage to Anne declared valid by Archbishop Cranmer, Katherine was less of a threat to them. They had already decided to move around the obstacle she presented rather than continuing to fight to get past it. If she died later, it wouldn't change the fact that they had married during her lifetime. They needed her surrender, her admission of the invalidity of her marriage to Henry, not her death.

Anne certainly wasn't stupid. Had Katherine died under suspicious circumstances, she would have topped the list of suspects so why take that step when her own position was weak and when Katherine was already in poor health, instead of waiting for Nature to do the job if she truly did want to see Katherine dead? Under other circumstances - ie, if the son she was carrying survived - Anne might have benefitted from Katherine's death but only if that death was natural. If it was suspected that she had helped Katherine shuffle off this mortal coil, then any benefit she derived from her death would be outweighed by the bad PR.
7  out of 8 found this valuable. Do you?    
Holly2
Holly2
35. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 5 2008, 2:45 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 5 2008, 2:45 PM EDT
Henry may have had slightly more of a motive to get rid of Katherine if he also hoped to get rid of Anne and start fresh but Anne was pregnant at the time, so I can't imagine that Henry was hoping for her to miscarry or have a girl to give him an excuse to get rid of her. 6  out of 7 found this valuable. Do you?    
lettice
lettice
36. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 5 2008, 4:06 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 5 2008, 4:06 PM EDT
"KATHERINE WAS MURDEERED . EITHER ANN OR HENRY ORDERED CATHERINE TO BE POISENED"
I'm not sure where you get that info from. If it was the series, it is not accurate.
5  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
Brunet
Brunet
37. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 6 2008, 12:36 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 6 2008, 12:36 AM EDT
"KATHERINE WAS MURDEERED . EITHER ANN OR HENRY ORDERED CATHERINE TO BE POISENED"
As MsSquirrly pointed out that was a rumor. From what I've read Eustace Chapuys, the Imperial Ambassdor, was mostly to blame for spreading that around court. I've never believed that of Anne for a moment. She knew how unpopular she was, and that any "accidents" that befell Katherine or Mary would be pinned on her. In turn that would have made both she and Elizabeth targets for retaliation. You also have to consider how dangerous that would have been for England politically. Any foul play could have resulted in war between England and Spain. Anne knew that.
5  out of 5 found this valuable. Do you?    
Impish_Impulse
Impish_Impulse
38. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 10 2008, 1:43 AM EDT | Post edited: Jun 30 2009, 9:27 AM EDT
"She (Anne) knew how unpopular she was, and that any "accidents" that befell Katherine or Mary would be pinned on her. "
Ooh, just had a thought regarding Elizabeth. Could the rumor-mongering that was spread accusing her mother of doing away with her romantic rival have had any influence on Elizabeth later immediately distancing herself from Robert Dudley when his wife turned up dead at the bottom of a staircase? She made him leave court while ordering an immediate inquest into what she called "a tragic fall". It didn't really help; gossip spread like wildfire that Lady Dudley had either been murdered by Elizabeth and/or Dudley; or that she had committed suicide over her despair at her husband preferring the queen to her. Even though the death was ruled accidental, it brought a halt to their flirtatious behavior, and afterward Elizabeth began to seriously encourage foreign suitors, and would dangle herself (quite skillfully, and for decades) as marital bait for whichever political alliance was advantageous at the time.
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
lettice
lettice
39. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Aug 10 2008, 9:11 AM EDT | Post edited: Aug 10 2008, 9:11 AM EDT
"Ooh, just had a thought regarding Elizabeth. Could the rumor-mongering that was spread accusing her mother doing away with her romantic rival have had any influence on Elizabeth later immediately distancing herself from Robert Dudley when his wife turned up dead at the bottom of a staircase? She made him leave court while ordering an immediate inquest into what she called "a tragic fall". It didn't really help; gossip spread like wildfire that Lady Dudley had either been murdered by Elizabeth and/or Dudley; or that she had committed suicide over her despair of her husband preferring the queen to her. Even though the death was ruled accidental, it brought a halt to their flirtatious behavior, and afterward Elizabeth began to seriously encourage foreign suitors, and would dangle herself (quite skillfully, and for decades) as marital bait for whichever political alliance was advantageous at the time. "
Absolutely! Elizabeth was wise enough to learn from her and others' mistakes. Contrary to her cousin Mary Stuart who remained impulsive and rash in her behavior costing her her head.
3  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)