Location: Episode 2.10

Discussion: The Juxaposition of Anne and JaneReported This is a featured thread

Showing 161 - 178 of 178  |  Show  posts at a time
First < Previous | 6 7 8 9
Jes89
Jes89
160. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 13 2008, 8:37 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 13 2008, 8:37 PM EST
"As for the changing of the 'seasons" for Henry, I wished showtime would have done something like that with the greatest respect of KOA. And my hope is someday that some producer will make a film about KOA starting as the Infanata.....and onward. I think it would be a fantastic story to tell."
You right!!!!
Catalina has so many fans, imagine if all her history was shown...
5  out of 5 found this valuable. Do you?    
QueenAnneBoleyn
QueenAnneBoleyn
161. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 5:39 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 5:39 AM EST
"I really did not like the way the interfacing of Anne dressing for her execution while Jane laughed and played with jewelry while wating for Henry to arrive.

I wanted to smack her hard! When she was jumping up and down getting her dress on and here was Anne, os solemn and discarded. I thought it made a good visual, but it was also very sad.

"Innocent" Jane knew what was happening at that very moment and didn't lose a wink of sleep over it."
I found it very unsettling and sad to see that too. I think was was good TV but that does not mean I liked it or enjoyed it.

In fact, I found it incredibly hard to watch any the last few episodes of season 2 because I knew what was coming and I didn't want to see it becuase it is so heartbreaking. But at the same time I did because I was so curious to see how, after everything that had happened between Anne and Henry and all the good times and the bad times they had shared forver united, Henry could possibly discard her. Of course I knew my history before I ever watched the saw but after seeing season 1 and falling completely it love with it especially Anne Boleyn's character, I was so confused as to how Henry could go from absolute worship and love and adoration of Anne to having her executed.

It really annoys me as well that Jane is always portryed as innocent. She quite evidently was not becuase she knew what was happening to Anne and even if she never liked her it is still completely inhumane of her to not feel any guilt at all.

I also think that Jane must have been naive and silly not to be worried about what what her life would be like with Henry as her husband. She must have seen how he treated his last two wives and be a little apprehensive about how he would treat her to. How can she have thought that she someone like her, with a character so meek and boring, would have a happy life with him when someone like Anne Boleyn could had nothing but misery in the later years of their relationship? Anne was so seductive, exciting, beautiful, passionate and intelligent and Henry went through much more to make her his wife than he did with Jane and it still ended in betrayel so how Jane could think she would be able to hold him I don't know.

The only possible thing that I can draw comfort from is that Anne's daughter became one of the greatest rulers in English history so really Anne won in the end.
3  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
The_Lady_Alicia
The_Lady_Alicia
162. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 6:04 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 6:04 AM EST
"I found it very unsettling and sad to see that too. I think was was good TV but that does not mean I liked it or enjoyed it.

In fact, I found it incredibly hard to watch any the last few episodes of season 2 because I knew what was coming and I didn't want to see it becuase it is so heartbreaking. But at the same time I did because I was so curious to see how, after everything that had happened between Anne and Henry and all the good times and the bad times they had shared forver united, Henry could possibly discard her. Of course I knew my history before I ever watched the saw but after seeing season 1 and falling completely it love with it especially Anne Boleyn's character, I was so confused as to how Henry could go from absolute worship and love and adoration of Anne to having her executed.

It really annoys me as well that Jane is always portryed as innocent. She quite evidently was not becuase she knew what was happening to Anne and even if she never liked her it is still completely inhumane of her to not feel any guilt at all.

I also think that Jane must have been naive and silly not to be worried about what what her life would be like with Henry as her husband. She must have seen how he treated his last two wives and be a little apprehensive about how he would treat her to. How can she have thought that she someone like her, with a character so meek and boring, would have a happy life with him when someone like Anne Boleyn could had nothing but misery in the later years of their relationship? Anne was so seductive, exciting, beautiful, passionate and intelligent and Henry went through much more to make her his wife than he did with Jane and it still ended in betrayel so how Jane could think she would be able to hold him I don't know.

The only possible thing that I can draw comfort from is that Anne's daughter became one of the greatest rulers in English history so really Anne won in the end. "
I agree, in my opinion I don't think Jane would have held him. I think that she probably died before he had the chance to get fed up with her. And i'm not so sure if the fact that she had given him a son would have been enough to keep him either. If Henry was bored of you he was bored of you end of story and he was so ruthless he just did discarded people without even flinching.

I don't think she would have had much say in the matter of becoming his wife. He wanted her so she had to comply.
2  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
Jes89
Jes89
163. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 9:27 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 9:27 AM EST
Anyone is innocent in this history,Anne made Katherine felt humiliated, Anne felt this way too when she discovered Henry's intentions with Jane,no one is innocent,unfortunately i'll die, and still will be thigs like "Anne the whore" "Mary the blood", it's sad... 4  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
164. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 1:57 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 1:57 PM EST
"I found it very unsettling and sad to see that too. I think was was good TV but that does not mean I liked it or enjoyed it.

In fact, I found it incredibly hard to watch any the last few episodes of season 2 because I knew what was coming and I didn't want to see it becuase it is so heartbreaking. But at the same time I did because I was so curious to see how, after everything that had happened between Anne and Henry and all the good times and the bad times they had shared forver united, Henry could possibly discard her. Of course I knew my history before I ever watched the saw but after seeing season 1 and falling completely it love with it especially Anne Boleyn's character, I was so confused as to how Henry could go from absolute worship and love and adoration of Anne to having her executed.

It really annoys me as well that Jane is always portryed as innocent. She quite evidently was not becuase she knew what was happening to Anne and even if she never liked her it is still completely inhumane of her to not feel any guilt at all.

I also think that Jane must have been naive and silly not to be worried about what what her life would be like with Henry as her husband. She must have seen how he treated his last two wives and be a little apprehensive about how he would treat her to. How can she have thought that she someone like her, with a character so meek and boring, would have a happy life with him when someone like Anne Boleyn could had nothing but misery in the later years of their relationship? Anne was so seductive, exciting, beautiful, passionate and intelligent and Henry went through much more to make her his wife than he did with Jane and it still ended in betrayel so how Jane could think she would be able to hold him I don't know.

The only possible thing that I can draw comfort from is that Anne's daughter became one of the greatest rulers in English history so really Anne won in the end. "
I feel like a broken record when I say this. And please I say this with respect really I do. But I will listen and try and understand, Again please understand these are my own personal opinions. First I do not say the saint and sinner thing. For Anne and Jane. But I would like your personal thoughts on how you can judge Jane so harshly when Annes conduct in regards to the Queen, KOA. and the King and Queens daughter Mary ? Also I will disagree that there is a difference and a big one from love and lust. And Im not sure which the KING felt of Anne. She held him at bay for 7 years. Yet had she not she would have been just another mistress possibly. And as for your qoute "It really annoys me as well that Jane is always portryed as innocent. She quite evidently was not becuase she knew what was happening to Anne and even if she never liked her it is still completely inhumane of her to not feel any guilt at all." Well lets say what about ANNE with KOA ? She knew the cards she was dealing, and entered a dangerous game since KOA was very loved, even if Henry had grew tired of her. SHE was married to him over 24 years. She was pregnant at least 6 times. She was The Regent who fought the Scots. She gave to the poor always making sure they had what they needed. And Anne came to court, and acted as Queen before she was. She was with child BEFORE being secretly married. She did have a girl, which disappointed the King and Yes she Elizabeth was one of the greatest rulers of England. As for Jane...He is buried with her. And we will never know nor can we judge that he would have taken another wife. After all she did give him a boy. So where is the justice for KOA when speaking so Ill of JANE...when in MY personal Opinion what AB did was FAR worse to KOA and Mary. Jane was not AB we know that. But I find it hypocritical to judge her when AB displaced KOA.
3  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
165. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 2:09 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 2:09 PM EST
"I agree, in my opinion I don't think Jane would have held him. I think that she probably died before he had the chance to get fed up with her. And i'm not so sure if the fact that she had given him a son would have been enough to keep him either. If Henry was bored of you he was bored of you end of story and he was so ruthless he just did discarded people without even flinching.

I don't think she would have had much say in the matter of becoming his wife. He wanted her so she had to comply. "
Disagree.....she had a son..he may have had affairs...but she had his son..........the one thng he always wanted. with respect
2  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
QueenAnneBoleyn
QueenAnneBoleyn
166. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 2:17 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 2:17 PM EST
"I feel like a broken record when I say this. And please I say this with respect really I do. But I will listen and try and understand, Again please understand these are my own personal opinions. First I do not say the saint and sinner thing. For Anne and Jane. But I would like your personal thoughts on how you can judge Jane so harshly when Annes conduct in regards to the Queen, KOA. and the King and Queens daughter Mary ? Also I will disagree that there is a difference and a big one from love and lust. And Im not sure which the KING felt of Anne. She held him at bay for 7 years. Yet had she not she would have been just another mistress possibly. And as for your qoute "It really annoys me as well that Jane is always portryed as innocent. She quite evidently was not becuase she knew what was happening to Anne and even if she never liked her it is still completely inhumane of her to not feel any guilt at all." Well lets say what about ANNE with KOA ? She knew the cards she was dealing, and entered a dangerous game since KOA was very loved, even if Henry had grew tired of her. SHE was married to him over 24 years. She was pregnant at least 6 times. She was The Regent who fought the Scots. She gave to the poor always making sure they had what they needed. And Anne came to court, and acted as Queen before she was. She was with child BEFORE being secretly married. She did have a girl, which disappointed the King and Yes she Elizabeth was one of the greatest rulers of England. As for Jane...He is buried with her. And we will never know nor can we judge that he would have taken another wife. After all she did give him a boy. So where is the justice for KOA when speaking so Ill of JANE...when in MY personal Opinion what AB did was FAR worse to KOA and Mary. Jane was not AB we know that. But I find it hypocritical to judge her when AB displaced KOA."
I have an answer to almost all of your questions. I realise that I may seem very biased toward Anne and in most ways I am but I am also not someone who just says what they want to be true.

Firstly, no we can never know whether or not Henry would have discared Jane or not be I think we can all have a pretty good guess. He may not have actually divorced her as she did give him a son but he would surely have tired of her and treated her badly. Let me just pretend that I am not biased towards Anne for a moment. It is still just common sense that when someone like Anne could not hold the King exclusively to her after all they went through to marry and someone like KOA could not convince him to give up his guest to marry her young lady-in-waiting, then how can someone as meek and weak as Jane hold him? She may not have argued as much as Anne or been as brave as KOA but he would have got bored. As I said it is just common sense.

Secondly, you accused me of being hypocritcal when it comes to Anne and KOA. Well I never said that Anne was guiltless because I never actually mentionned KOA at all and if I had then I would have said that Anne was far from perfect. Anyway KOA was different. She had a choice and she was never murdered and never had to see her friends and relatives murdered because of something she was accused of. KOA could have retired to a nunnery early on in the whole affair and then Mary might not have even been made a basterd. She brought most of the suffering on herself.

I quote you here "After all she did give him a boy." Yes no one can argue with that but the son she gave him was weak and sickly from birth and died before he could even rule by himself. I don't think I need to say anymore. And yes Anne did not give Henry a son but I believe that is he had given her a bit more time she would have been able to.
CONTINUED UNDERNEATH:
3  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
offwithherhead
offwithherhead
167. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 2:20 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 2:20 PM EST
"Disagree.....she had a son..he may have had affairs...but she had his son..........the one thng he always wanted. with respect"
I agree with you funrod....I think his eye would eventually wonder and he would eventually have affairs, because it was in his nature to want the next best thing, but I don't think he would have discarded her because she DID give him a son....it was, after all, the one great thing he desired above all else. Also he would have had no grounds to discard her.....of course we all know that he could trump up charges, but I believe that he would feel some sort of obligation to Jane to keep her as Queen, even if his eye wandered.
4  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
QueenAnneBoleyn
QueenAnneBoleyn
168. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 2:23 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 2:23 PM EST
CONTINUED FROM ABOVE:

When you say: " Yet has she not she would have just been another mistress." I can agrue with you on that point aswell. It is believed that Henry would not have wanted to make Anne his mistress at least not when they were properly into their courtship. He wanted nothing more than to make his love his Queen and he would settle for nothing less. I find that it is an insult to Henry himself by saying that just because some young girl refused him he had to go to all those lengths to be able to bed her, becuase he was a great ruler and he would never have put his country through everything that he did if he was not at least in love.

Lastly I believe that you stated that Henry is buried next to Jane. Well just think on this - what choice did he have? All of his other wives had been disgraced by him in some way or another whether rightly or wrongly and his present wife out lived him.

These are just my opinions aswell and nothing can ever be proved but I know for sure we will continue to debate over it.
4  out of 7 found this valuable. Do you?    
Tudorprincess
Tudorprincess
169. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 2:35 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 2:35 PM EST
Well Henry didn't want a lover, he wanted a wife. Thats one of the reasons why he began to turn on Anne. She wasn't wife material. She always challenged him and never did as she was told. Put this together with the inability to have a son, and this is why he had her executed. Jane, on the other hand, was a good little wife who obeyed her husband, produced a healthy son and came from a large family which had many sons. I don't think he would have discarded of her. He may have cheated on her, but ultimately we will never know. He said he loved her the most, i'm not doubting that. Why speculate when he said so himself? Considering he could have married any woman in the land he wanted, who would have obeyed him, why would he go for her if her instead of a court beauty? There must have been something there which he loved about her. 6  out of 7 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
170. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 2:39 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 2:39 PM EST
"CONTINUED FROM ABOVE:

When you say: " Yet has she not she would have just been another mistress." I can agrue with you on that point aswell. It is believed that Henry would not have wanted to make Anne his mistress at least not when they were properly into their courtship. He wanted nothing more than to make his love his Queen and he would settle for nothing less. I find that it is an insult to Henry himself by saying that just because some young girl refused him he had to go to all those lengths to be able to bed her, becuase he was a great ruler and he would never have put his country through everything that he did if he was not at least in love.

Lastly I believe that you stated that Henry is buried next to Jane. Well just think on this - what choice did he have? All of his other wives had been disgraced by him in some way or another whether rightly or wrongly and his present wife out lived him.

These are just my opinions aswell and nothing can ever be proved but I know for sure we will continue to debate over it.
"
I just want to apologize if you thought I was calling you in particular a hypocrite. Not my intention. As for divorcing Jane, with one attempt KOA and one beheaded, I think the King would have been very unwise to keep taking up causes the people could not understand. And I think the people who were in the KINGS inner circle would have advised differently. Also only because I made this error myself and was corrected by someone on the wiki, Edward was not born a sickly child. I believe he caught something that caused his death. So I only say this to you because I too thought the same and was corrected. Maybe Tudor or Liv can give you the info as I dont know the exact info. As for Jane being called meek I find that hardly to be the case. She brought Mary back into the Kings good graces and attempted with Elizabeth at Edwards baptism. This in itself was very brave of her considering how the King felt at that time. Again the debate whether he would remarry because he became bored with her we will never know. I just know I dont think he would have but again as I told you with much respect its only a personal opinion.

Now on to KOA you didnt mention her I Did. And For those who think she could have saved herself or Mary or that it was in ANY way her fault. Sorry again disagree. WHY would a women declare her child who was once beloved by both parents a bastard ? Why would she go to a nunnery ? It went against everything her faith told her. This was against everything and would have been sacreligious for her to do. She hardly brought this on herself. She was a faithful and loving Queen who did not deserve to be seperated from her child and die a slow death. No she didnt watch her brother or others killed in her name. She was left in horrid conditions with little and died in dignity and forgivness of the horrible treatment bestowed upon her.
4  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
171. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 2:40 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 2:40 PM EST
"Well Henry didn't want a lover, he wanted a wife. Thats one of the reasons why he began to turn on Anne. She wasn't wife material. She always challenged him and never did as she was told. Put this together with the inability to have a son, and this is why he had her executed. Jane, on the other hand, was a good little wife who obeyed her husband, produced a healthy son and came from a large family which had many sons. I don't think he would have discarded of her. He may have cheated on her, but ultimately we will never know. He said he loved her the most, i'm not doubting that. Why speculate when he said so himself? Considering he could have married any woman in the land he wanted, who would have obeyed him, why would he go for her if her instead of a court beauty? There must have been something there which he loved about her."
very true tudor and well said. Can you explain the Edward thing. I know I too thought he was sickly but I know he wasnt I just dont remember why he died.
3  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
funrod6
funrod6
172. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 2:47 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 2:47 PM EST
"CONTINUED FROM ABOVE:

When you say: " Yet has she not she would have just been another mistress." I can agrue with you on that point aswell. It is believed that Henry would not have wanted to make Anne his mistress at least not when they were properly into their courtship. He wanted nothing more than to make his love his Queen and he would settle for nothing less. I find that it is an insult to Henry himself by saying that just because some young girl refused him he had to go to all those lengths to be able to bed her, becuase he was a great ruler and he would never have put his country through everything that he did if he was not at least in love.

Lastly I believe that you stated that Henry is buried next to Jane. Well just think on this - what choice did he have? All of his other wives had been disgraced by him in some way or another whether rightly or wrongly and his present wife out lived him.

These are just my opinions aswell and nothing can ever be proved but I know for sure we will continue to debate over it.
"
Cont....

As for him having nothing less. I believe it was ANNE that would have nothing less but to be Queen. I think the attraction that someone actually said no to the KING intrigued him very much. As well as Annes ability to use her position of a sensual witty women saying nope Not till Im your Queen. Lust vs Love sometimes hard to say. But I do know that Anne did NOT know when to be quiet. And the King did not fancy that behavior in a wife. Along the fact that she was unable to give him a son. I think it is horrible that he hatched a plan so terrible to rid of her. But that doesnt sound like love. It sounds like a King who was looking for something, and when he didnt get it was very angry. And thus AB fate; As terrible as that was; And I do say that with sincerity.
3  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
Tudorprincess
Tudorprincess
173. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 2:57 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 2:57 PM EST
"very true tudor and well said. Can you explain the Edward thing. I know I too thought he was sickly but I know he wasnt I just dont remember why he died."
Edward was a robust child, and was healthy until he was around fourteen when he contracted the measles. Measels suppresses your immune system, and since Edward was Henry's only son, he fretted over him and made sure that all his quarters were super clean and basically mollycoddled him. This meant that his immune system wouldnt have been as well built up anyway compared to other children's, and contracting the measels would have made it worse.

Then after the measels, he either caught tuberculosis when he was vulnerable to the diseases, or the measels triggered tuberculosis, and this eventually killed him. So you can either blame Henry for being too overprotective of his son, or just say that Edward, like many children and people at the time, was just unfortunate enough to catch the disease that killed him.
4  out of 5 found this valuable. Do you?    
Jes89
Jes89
174. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 3:18 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 3:18 PM EST
"Secondly, you accused me of being hypocritcal when it comes to Anne and KOA. Well I never said that Anne was guiltless because I never actually mentionned KOA at all and if I had then I would have said that Anne was far from perfect. Anyway KOA was different. She had a choice and she was never murdered and never had to see her friends and relatives murdered because of something she was accused of. KOA could have retired to a nunnery early on in the whole affair and then Mary might not have even been made a basterd. She brought most of the suffering on herself.

"
About KOA, ok she had a choice, WE can see, but she couldn't because to her accept go easily to a nunnery was the same to say that she was never married, she was never queen, and she was just Henry's concumbine for 20 years, of course she couldn't accept.
About Mary, she wasn't taught to be a princess, or a consort, she was taught to be a queen, somethins very normal to Katherine, since she was daughter of great queen Isabella,queen in her own right. But not normal to henry, to have a girl as heir, to a country with men's tradicional rulers.
3  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    

bonnebelle
175. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 3:34 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 3:34 PM EST
Henry had no trouble ridding himself of a wife of over 20 years, another for whom he had waited years and taken great political risks--and not only wives, but friends and advisors who seemed to deny him what he wanted. I think ultimately that was the test--how much could fate allow someone to give Henry all that he expected? Sadly, I think bending to Henry's will was more important to him than any real inherent value or true loyalty a person had. 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
offwithherhead
offwithherhead
176. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 16 2008, 4:05 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 16 2008, 4:05 PM EST
"Henry had no trouble ridding himself of a wife of over 20 years, another for whom he had waited years and taken great political risks--and not only wives, but friends and advisors who seemed to deny him what he wanted. I think ultimately that was the test--how much could fate allow someone to give Henry all that he expected? Sadly, I think bending to Henry's will was more important to him than any real inherent value or true loyalty a person had. "
I think you are right bonnebelle....if we asked ourselves one question to everything bad that took place during Henry's rule, I think things are clear.....and that question is "Did what happened benefit Henry in any way?"......whether it be discarding Katherine....executing Anne.....executing Moore and Fisher and thousands of others.....executing Katherine Howard....separating from the Catholic faith. Everything beneitted Henry and not necessarily England or his subjects or family....it was all about Henry!!
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
LadyNan
LadyNan
177. RE: The Juxaposition of Anne and Jane
Nov 17 2008, 12:43 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 17 2008, 12:43 AM EST
"Anne came to court, and acted as Queen before she was. She was with child BEFORE being secretly married. She did have a girl, which disappointed the King and Yes she Elizabeth was one of the greatest rulers of England. As for Jane...He is buried with her. And we will never know nor can we judge that he would have taken another wife. After all she did give him a boy. So where is the justice for KOA when speaking so Ill of JANE...when in MY personal Opinion what AB did was FAR worse to KOA and Mary. Jane was not AB we know that. But I find it hypocritical to judge her when AB displaced KOA."
Henry and Anne had been betrothed for years and once the marriage with Katherine had been dissolved, it was not uncommon for betrothed people to sleep together before the formal wedding ceremony in the 16th century.

Are you not also being hypocritical in not condemning Jane as harshly as you condemn Anne considering you say they did the same thing? Isn't it far worse to take a man's emotions away from his wife while he is still sleeping with her? Henry had stopped sleeiping with Katherine 2 years before he fell for Anne and she left court when she knew he was pursuing her. With Jane, she entertaine Henry's courtship while still sleepin with Anne who actually became pregnant during this time. Anne was totally blindsided while Katherine was aware of Henry's many affairs which she turned a blindeye to.

However, both women miscalculated what the fickle nature of Henry meant for their lives. He would most certainly have moved on to other women even if Jane had survived but he would never have annulled their marriage or murdered her as long as, her son survived. Henry was building a dynasty and wives be damned.
4  out of 7 found this valuable. Do you?    
First < Previous | 6 7 8 9

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)