Already a member?
Sign in
Location: George Boleyn
Discussion: George's Affair with Smeaton
Keyword tags:
anne boleyn
charles brandon
gabrielle anwar
george boleyn
henry viii
jeremy northam
jonathan rhys meyers
margaret tudor
mark smeaton
natalie dormer
padraic delaney
sam neill
showtime the tudors
the tudors
tudors characters
Watch
|
rpshaf |
George's Affair with Smeaton
Apr 21 2008, 8:34 AM EDT I was moved by the scene with a shirtless Smeaton and George made contact. I hope there is more on this affair to come. I think this adds to both the characters. George is a true beauty, and as a gay man - want to see more 15 out of 21 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
aragon77 aragon77 |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
Apr 21 2008, 8:36 AM EDT Do you think this affair was fact or fiction??? I am not sure. I have to be honest the Tudors history I never followed, so I am learning. 1 out of 4 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
elizabeth83197 |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
Apr 21 2008, 9:16 AM EDT I am not sure about this fact either. I know it hinted at it in The Other Boleyn Girl but that is fictional history. That is the only book I have ever read anything about it. 3 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Boudica |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
Apr 21 2008, 12:13 PM EDT "Do you think this affair was fact or fiction??? I am not sure. I have to be honest the Tudors history I never followed, so I am learning. "There's no evidence that George and Mark had an affair. As for George or Mark being gay.... there's a theory proposed by historian Retha M. Warnicke, who wrote "The Rise and Fall of Anne Bolyen", she claims that it was impossible for any of the five men who were accused of adultery with Anne Boleyn, because all five of them were homosexual. I personally find this a dubious claim, as do other historians like Eric Ives. I'm guessing Showtime might be building off the Warnicke theory, in showing that the charges against Anne and the five men were unfounded because they were either gay (Mark and George) or trying to kill her (William Brereton). That's just my theory anyway. :) 5 out of 5 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
MsSquirrly |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
Apr 21 2008, 2:18 PM EDT "There's no evidence that George and Mark had an affair. As for George or Mark being gay.... there's a theory proposed by historian Retha M. Warnicke, who wrote "The Rise and Fall of Anne Bolyen", she claims that it was impossible for any of the five men who were accused of adultery with Anne Boleyn, because all five of them were homosexual. I personally find this a dubious claim, as do other historians like Eric Ives. I'm guessing Showtime might be building off the Warnicke theory, in showing that the charges against Anne and the five men were unfounded because they were either gay (Mark and George) or trying to kill her (William Brereton). That's just my theory anyway. :)"Yes Warnicke and Ives have been at odds about a few things. From what I can see Warnicke seems to say that the men "MAY" have been homosexual because the court accepted the claims of sexual misconduct so easily. They were well known "libertines"...however I am not sure what her evidence for that is. Chapuys who hated Anne and the faction that surrounded her, in his account of the arrest and executions never mentions anything about that. Personally I think the court "accepted" it because the ones that were left were either sighing with relief that they weren't implicated or they hated the Boleyns and were glad they were gone. 6 out of 6 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
aragon77 aragon77 |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
Apr 21 2008, 3:08 PM EDT I'm suprise that Henry did not have a homosexual relationship since he was so free spirited with the women. 0 out of 6 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
MsSquirrly |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
Apr 21 2008, 3:17 PM EDT "I'm suprise that Henry did not have a homosexual relationship since he was so free spirited with the women."Why would that follow? Sexual preference is sexual preference...nothing to do with promiscuity. 9 out of 9 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
PatPape PatPape |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
Apr 23 2008, 7:08 PM EDT There is no evidence that the real George was gay, however, he very much disliked his wife and I'm surprised we have not seen her in this show. She has been portrayed as a most evil woman, but there is a new book out that indicates that she probably got the bad rep in the years after her death. Anyway - all the Boleyns were pretty much about ME ME ME... 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
PatPape PatPape |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
Apr 23 2008, 7:12 PM EDT Henry was totally into being a he-man ... Some historians say that George was actually convicted of his so-called crime with Anne because he was given a piece of paper to read (silently) during his trial. He was only supposed to say that he knew the statement to be true or false. However, George read it out loud - which indicated that Anne had told him that Henry sometimes couldn't get it up. That attack on the king's manliness was probably what got his head whacked off... 3 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
aragon77 aragon77 |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
May 6 2008, 7:49 AM EDT "Why would that follow? Sexual preference is sexual preference...nothing to do with promiscuity."I followed b/c it was opinion that I formed about Henry's character. I know sexual preference and promiscuity is neither here nor there, but the fact that apparently, Henry, had a sex addition that's my reason for believing that its about sex not man or woman. Hope that answered your question b/c that's the best I could explain my opinion of Henry. 0 out of 4 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
aragon77 aragon77 |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
May 6 2008, 7:52 AM EDT "Henry was totally into being a he-man ... Some historians say that George was actually convicted of his so-called crime with Anne because he was given a piece of paper to read (silently) during his trial. He was only supposed to say that he knew the statement to be true or false. However, George read it out loud - which indicated that Anne had told him that Henry sometimes couldn't get it up. That attack on the king's manliness was probably what got his head whacked off..."Well it’s good I'm in the present, so that I can have my freedom of speech about his manliness w/o getting my head whacked off....! My read out loud of Henry is not about his manliness, but his obsession with POWER. 2 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
PatPape PatPape |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
May 6 2008, 9:17 AM EDT I don't think there is any evidence that Henry had a sex addiction just because he had relations with multiiple women (the TV show is something of a sexy soap opera ... so JRM gets to have "sex" with lots of ladies). Apparently, once Henry was older (40-ish) and fat and gouty, which he would have been about this time in the TV show we are watching, he was not the man about town he had once been but he always liked to think of himself as quite studly and handsome (despite all evidence to the contrary in later years). Personally, I think Henry was a romance-holic. He wanted the romance, the courtly passions, etc (and a son) and once he had his women and they had been around a while, he tired of them (romance wore off). BTW - have you ever seen Henry's suit of armor at the Tower in London. His cod piece is about the size of a bowling ball. He wanted to be the he-man no matter what... 3 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
aragon77 aragon77 |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
May 6 2008, 9:32 AM EDT "I don't think there is any evidence that Henry had a sex addiction just because he had relations with multiiple women (the TV show is something of a sexy soap opera ... so JRM gets to have "sex" with lots of ladies). Apparently, once Henry was older (40-ish) and fat and gouty, which he would have been about this time in the TV show we are watching, he was not the man about town he had once been but he always liked to think of himself as quite studly and handsome (despite all evidence to the contrary in later years). Personally, I think Henry was a romance-holic. He wanted the romance, the courtly passions, etc (and a son) and once he had his women and they had been around a while, he tired of them (romance wore off). BTW - have you ever seen Henry's suit of armor at the Tower in London. His cod piece is about the size of a bowling ball. He wanted to be the he-man no matter what..."Uuum romance-holic. No, I've never been to the tower of London. Do you find this valuable? |
|
miller-pvkk miller-pvkk |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
May 6 2008, 9:45 AM EDT "Yes Warnicke and Ives have been at odds about a few things. From what I can see Warnicke seems to say that the men "MAY" have been homosexual because the court accepted the claims of sexual misconduct so easily. They were well known "libertines"...however I am not sure what her evidence for that is. Chapuys who hated Anne and the faction that surrounded her, in his account of the arrest and executions never mentions anything about that. Personally I think the court "accepted" it because the ones that were left were either sighing with relief that they weren't implicated or they hated the Boleyns and were glad they were gone."I haven't started reading Warnicke's book yet because I'm reading two other Tudor books, but it doesn't appear, from hearing what you and others say, that she really has sufficient evidence to back up her claims. If, in the show, they must depict George as gay, why must he be such a creepy gay who brutally rapes his wife? As I've said on another thread, this reinforces certain stereotypes. If you're going to depict a guy as gay when there's little evidence that he was, you can at least depict him as a decent gay person. You bring up a good point as usual MsSquirrly regarding Chapuys. Chapuys hated Anne and helped spread the rumors about an extra finger and an extra nipple or whatever it was suppose to be on her neck. Many historians have determined that none of those rumors about Anne's appearance were true. If there was any truth to the contention that George and these other guys were gay, wouldn't Chapuys have delighted in spreading that story across the entire European continent?Yet as far as I know, he never mentioned it. This reinforces my belief that Warnicke's conclusions about George's sexual orientation are not accurate. It's amazing how many of our discussions have been about his issue! The other issue that keeps getting mentioned is how Henry's sister Mary is depicted as Margaret in season 1. 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
miller-pvkk miller-pvkk |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
May 6 2008, 9:49 AM EDT "Henry was totally into being a he-man ... Some historians say that George was actually convicted of his so-called crime with Anne because he was given a piece of paper to read (silently) during his trial. He was only supposed to say that he knew the statement to be true or false. However, George read it out loud - which indicated that Anne had told him that Henry sometimes couldn't get it up. That attack on the king's manliness was probably what got his head whacked off..."Yes, George did insist on reading out loud what was written on that piece of paper - which is that Henry wasn't quite as manly as everyone thought and sometimes had trouble performing. This probably helped seal his fate, but chances are he was doomed anyway. At least he got one last laugh at Henry's expense. 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
miller-pvkk miller-pvkk |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
May 6 2008, 9:59 AM EDT "I don't think there is any evidence that Henry had a sex addiction just because he had relations with multiiple women (the TV show is something of a sexy soap opera ... so JRM gets to have "sex" with lots of ladies). Apparently, once Henry was older (40-ish) and fat and gouty, which he would have been about this time in the TV show we are watching, he was not the man about town he had once been but he always liked to think of himself as quite studly and handsome (despite all evidence to the contrary in later years). Personally, I think Henry was a romance-holic. He wanted the romance, the courtly passions, etc (and a son) and once he had his women and they had been around a while, he tired of them (romance wore off). BTW - have you ever seen Henry's suit of armor at the Tower in London. His cod piece is about the size of a bowling ball. He wanted to be the he-man no matter what..."I've also speculated that Henry was in love with the idea of being in love. I guess one could also say that he was a romance-aholic. Do they have a support group for that? Most of all, he was in love with the chase, and once that was over he became incredibly bored. I've seen his arrmor at the Tower of London. I was only 12 at the time, so it didn't quite have the effect on me that Henry would have probably wanted. I've seen pictures since then, and the cod piece is hard to miss. What a distraction that must have been for all those noble ladies at Henry's court. 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Hever |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
May 6 2008, 1:30 PM EDT "I've also speculated that Henry was in love with the idea of being in love. I guess one could also say that he was a romance-aholic. Do they have a support group for that? Most of all, he was in love with the chase, and once that was over he became incredibly bored. I've seen his arrmor at the Tower of London. I was only 12 at the time, so it didn't quite have the effect on me that Henry would have probably wanted. I've seen pictures since then, and the cod piece is hard to miss. What a distraction that must have been for all those noble ladies at Henry's court."Romance~ aholic. Good word. I feel sorry for Henry a little bit, he didn't quite find what he was looking for. Some might say Jane Seymour was, but she would have gone the way of the rest if she hadn't had a son. He would have soon tired of her too. 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
aragon77 aragon77 |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
May 6 2008, 4:21 PM EDT "Romance~ aholic. Good word. I feel sorry for Henry a little bit, he didn't quite find what he was looking for. Some might say Jane Seymour was, but she would have gone the way of the rest if she hadn't had a son. He would have soon tired of her too."Yes, Hever I think he would have been tired of her too. I just think something was wrong with Henry not in a bad way, but maybe he suffered as a child or something. I will admit I like a chase, I don't like being chased is that weird or what, and once I conquer the chase I am not as interested, and I'm a girl LOL. Do you find this valuable? |
|
dawnner dawnner |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
May 8 2008, 4:12 PM EDT I don't think the rape scene has anything to do the depiction of George being a homosexual. That can be disputed historically, since there is little proof of such a thing...basically rumor. What can be historically proven though is this. George was well known for his womanizing, and that is where the rape scene comes from. IMHO Do you find this valuable? |
|
miller-pvkk miller-pvkk |
RE: George's Affair with Smeaton
May 15 2008, 4:34 AM EDT "Romance~ aholic. Good word. I feel sorry for Henry a little bit, he didn't quite find what he was looking for. Some might say Jane Seymour was, but she would have gone the way of the rest if she hadn't had a son. He would have soon tired of her too."Probably faster than he did Katherine and Anne, considering that Jane was not as educated or as well read as Henry's first two wives. The one thing she would have had going for her (besides having a son) is that Henry was getting too old for his famous sexual romps. Just getting the wife pregnant had become more of an ordeal for him. Do you find this valuable? |
