Welcome! Wikis are websites that everyone can build together. It's easy!

Location: Anne Boleyn - Historical Profile

Discussion: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.


Watch

Anonymous  (Get credit for your thread)


2 3 | Next
MsSquirrly
MsSquirrly
Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.
Apr 11 2008, 10:30 AM EDT
That sentence was in the "Interesting Facts" on this page about Anne Boleyn which started some comments so I thought I would start a thread so more opinions can be added. Here were the comments:

- WRONG: Katharine of Aragon did it (as in 'no' to the divorce, 'no' to being deposed as queen, 'no' to sending Princess Mary's christening robes for Ann's daughter to wear) for years, and in the end, she kept her head, but then, she was the aunt of the Emperor Charles V, whom Henry feared, as well as royal in her own right and a Spanish national.

- Katherine may have 'said' no but Henry did divorce her, did depose her as queen and had his way regardless of her protests. Whereas Anne said she would not be his mistress.

- Anne stopped saying 'no' and became Henry's mistress before her secret marriage and sometime after being created Marquess of Pembroke. Anne came to her marrriage on January 25th 1533 pregnant. Erickson, "Mistress Anne. pg 186, Fraser, "The Wives of Henry VIII pg 187, Weir, pp 240-41, Williams, "Henry VIII and His Court" , pg 123. Fraser quotes Ives who is thought to be more sympathetic to Anne, Apparently even he wrote about Anne's pre-marital pregnancy, so they all must have had a contemporary source.
Katharine never stopped saying 'no' and kept her head in spite of that. Anne said 'no' to Henry's subsequent affairs and did not give him a son besides. He deposed her, divorced her, and beheaded her.


- Jane Seymour also said 'no' to Henry - When he was courting her during his marriage to Anne, he sent her a purse of money and a letter. Jane returned both gifts without even opening the letter, refusing to be his mistress, and often reminded Henry of the fact that he was still married.
11  out of 11 found this valuable. Do you?    
lettice
lettice
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.
Apr 11 2008, 12:43 PM EDT
"That sentence was in the "Interesting Facts" on this page about Anne Boleyn which started some comments so I thought I would start a thread so more opinions can be added. Here were the comments:

- WRONG: Katharine of Aragon did it (as in 'no' to the divorce, 'no' to being deposed as queen, 'no' to sending Princess Mary's christening robes for Ann's daughter to wear) for years, and in the end, she kept her head, but then, she was the aunt of the Emperor Charles V, whom Henry feared, as well as royal in her own right and a Spanish national.

- Katherine may have 'said' no but Henry did divorce her, did depose her as queen and had his way regardless of her protests. Whereas Anne said she would not be his mistress.

- Anne stopped saying 'no' and became Henry's mistress before her secret marriage and sometime after being created Marquess of Pembroke. Anne came to her marrriage on January 25th 1533 pregnant. Erickson, "Mistress Anne. pg 186, Fraser, "The Wives of Henry VIII pg 187, Weir, pp 240-41, Williams, "Henry VIII and His Court" , pg 123. Fraser quotes Ives who is thought to be more sympathetic to Anne, Apparently even he wrote about Anne's pre-marital pregnancy, so they all must have had a contemporary source.
Katharine never stopped saying 'no' and kept her head in spite of that. Anne said 'no' to Henry's subsequent affairs and did not give him a son besides. He deposed her, divorced her, and beheaded her.


- Jane Seymour also said 'no' to Henry - When he was courting her during his marriage to Anne, he sent her a purse of money and a letter. Jane returned both gifts without even opening the letter, refusing to be his mistress, and often reminded Henry of the fact that he was still married."
A 3 part TV series on Henry VIII's wives hosted by David Starkey brought out an interesting point: The King could command most things except one's consent to have an affair with him; he always asked. Who knows how many may have said "no".
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
SemperEadem
SemperEadem
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.
Apr 11 2008, 5:31 PM EDT
"A 3 part TV series on Henry VIII's wives hosted by David Starkey brought out an interesting point: The King could command most things except one's consent to have an affair with him; he always asked. Who knows how many may have said "no"."
But would you or your family want to say "no" when you knew the rewards it could gain you? :-D

Do you find this valuable?    
angelosdaughter
angelosdaughter
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.
Apr 12 2008, 4:13 PM EDT
"But would you or your family want to say "no" when you knew the rewards it could gain you? :-D

"
No, and very likely the chosen lady would not have dared to say 'no' to the king's courting; Henry was often small-minded and vengeful, but single-minded in his pursuit. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that he could take revenge on the family of a lady who resisted his advances to say nothing of how that same reluctant lady would be treated by her family. It was not unknown for young women to be beaten into submission to a suit they did not favor.. Remember, it was a man's world, no matter how high a lady's status.
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
Shadow_in_the_Sun
Shadow_in_the_Sun
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.
Apr 13 2008, 4:58 AM EDT
Yeah, I added the Jane Seymour bit. I'm trying to think of some more examples. Do you find this valuable?    
Shadow_in_the_Sun
Shadow_in_the_Sun
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.O
Apr 13 2008, 5:19 AM EDT
OH! Let's not forget Pope Clement VII, who said "no" to Henry's request for a divorce! 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
LADY_SAVANNAH
LADY_SAVANNAH
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.
Apr 13 2008, 12:05 PM EDT
"That sentence was in the "Interesting Facts" on this page about Anne Boleyn which started some comments so I thought I would start a thread so more opinions can be added. Here were the comments:

- WRONG: Katharine of Aragon did it (as in 'no' to the divorce, 'no' to being deposed as queen, 'no' to sending Princess Mary's christening robes for Ann's daughter to wear) for years, and in the end, she kept her head, but then, she was the aunt of the Emperor Charles V, whom Henry feared, as well as royal in her own right and a Spanish national.

- Katherine may have 'said' no but Henry did divorce her, did depose her as queen and had his way regardless of her protests. Whereas Anne said she would not be his mistress.

- Anne stopped saying 'no' and became Henry's mistress before her secret marriage and sometime after being created Marquess of Pembroke. Anne came to her marrriage on January 25th 1533 pregnant. Erickson, "Mistress Anne. pg 186, Fraser, "The Wives of Henry VIII pg 187, Weir, pp 240-41, Williams, "Henry VIII and His Court" , pg 123. Fraser quotes Ives who is thought to be more sympathetic to Anne, Apparently even he wrote about Anne's pre-marital pregnancy, so they all must have had a contemporary source.
Katharine never stopped saying 'no' and kept her head in spite of that. Anne said 'no' to Henry's subsequent affairs and did not give him a son besides. He deposed her, divorced her, and beheaded her.


- Jane Seymour also said 'no' to Henry - When he was courting her during his marriage to Anne, he sent her a purse of money and a letter. Jane returned both gifts without even opening the letter, refusing to be his mistress, and often reminded Henry of the fact that he was still married."
yes i do agree that she was probally one of a few to say no, try to place your self in that time frame in that situation what would you have done? i mean did not every one look for advance ment then?
Do you find this valuable?    
SemperEadem
SemperEadem
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.
Apr 14 2008, 12:28 AM EDT
"Remember, it was a man's world, no matter how high a lady's status. "
No joke about that, and I completely agree with everything you say, angelosdaughter. Often, the only time "no" worked favourably was what Shadow in the Sun said about Jane Seymour. That "no" only served to display Jane's "pious" and "virtuous" nature. She had a good example of how to string him along from the mistress before her.
Do you find this valuable?    
Boudica
Boudica
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.O
Apr 14 2008, 9:11 AM EDT
"OH! Let's not forget Pope Clement VII, who said "no" to Henry's request for a divorce!"
Perfect example, Shadow!
Yeah, this "no" assertion is the only item on the interesting facts list that I have a wee bit of an opposition to. Then again, the sentence does say "probably" asserting that we can't know for sure but in all likihood Anne Boleyn was not the only person, or woman for that matter, to say "no". I think it would be better served if it were rewritten to say, Anne Boleyn was the only woman to say "no" to being the King's mistress.
Do you find this valuable?    
lettice
lettice
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.O
Apr 14 2008, 12:43 PM EDT
"Perfect example, Shadow!
Yeah, this "no" assertion is the only item on the interesting facts list that I have a wee bit of an opposition to. Then again, the sentence does say "probably" asserting that we can't know for sure but in all likihood Anne Boleyn was not the only person, or woman for that matter, to say "no". I think it would be better served if it were rewritten to say, Anne Boleyn was the only woman to say "no" to being the King's mistress."
I believe Jane Seymour said no as well, when she was offered a gift of gold crowns. She made it clear the role of mistress was not for her as well. "no can be said in many ways.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Boudica
Boudica
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.O
Apr 14 2008, 1:01 PM EDT
"I believe Jane Seymour said no as well, when she was offered a gift of gold crowns. She made it clear the role of mistress was not for her as well. "no can be said in many ways."
Du-oh! Forgot about that Jane, and Katherine of Aragon = saying "no" to a divorce.
Do you find this valuable?    
Boudica
Boudica
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.O
Apr 16 2008, 9:34 AM EDT
I just came across something reading David Starkey's "Elizabeth" the other day:
"[Anne] made plain that although she would give Henry her heart she would not give him her body until they were married. It was the first time SINCE THE DEATH OF HIS FATHER that anybody dared say 'no' to Henry."
I think that statement might be legit.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
angelosdaughter
angelosdaughter
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.O
Apr 17 2008, 4:08 PM EDT
"I just came across something reading David Starkey's "Elizabeth" the other day:
"[Anne] made plain that although she would give Henry her heart she would not give him her body until they were married. It was the first time SINCE THE DEATH OF HIS FATHER that anybody dared say 'no' to Henry."
I think that statement might be legit."
Well, whatever the case, Anne's "no" was not her final word. Three of the varied sources (nonfiction) that I've read -and one uses Ives who is thought to be sympathetic to her as a source - say that she came to her secret wedding day already pregnant. The intimacy was thought to have begun sometime after she was created Marquess of Pembroke.
Do you find this valuable?    
Boudica
Boudica
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.O
Apr 17 2008, 4:29 PM EDT
"Well, whatever the case, Anne's "no" was not her final word. Three of the varied sources (nonfiction) that I've read -and one uses Ives who is thought to be sympathetic to her as a source - say that she came to her secret wedding day already pregnant. The intimacy was thought to have begun sometime after she was created Marquess of Pembroke. "
And some sources, including Ives, believes she possibly concieved during her visit to Calais with Henry, but nobody knows for sure. Consumation of the relationship in 1532/33 is only proof we have of Anne bedding the King before they were married, and for the time period, it wasn't unheard of for bethrothed persons to have sexual relations before marriage and even for a bride to be already pregnant at the wedding. By 1532, Katherine was known as "dowager Princess" and in Henry's mind he was free to marry Anne, except for permission from the Pope, who never gave it to him.
Do you find this valuable?    
Boudica
Boudica
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.O
Apr 17 2008, 4:34 PM EDT
In fact, Katherine of Aragon had her first child in January of 1510 and she was married to Henry in June of 1509...seven months. Do you find this valuable?    
angelosdaughter
angelosdaughter
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.O
Apr 17 2008, 11:54 PM EDT
"In fact, Katherine of Aragon had her first child in January of 1510 and she was married to Henry in June of 1509...seven months."
Yes, that was permitted to betrothed persons, but another reason for the secrecy of the marriage was that Henry was waiting for the bulls (decrees) from Rome appointing his man Cranmer Archbishop of Canterbury. That gave Cranmer the authority to grant the divorce/annulment. Henry did not want to antagonize Clement VII because then the appointment might not happen. He was in a spot; he needed to marry the pregnant Anne to assure the legitimacy of the child she carried, but he could not let it be generally known that he had. He needed a validly appointed Archbishop to declare his first marriage invalid which Cranmer did on May 23rd 1533. Fraser, "The Six Wives of Henry VIII" pp 187-88, 190,
So at that point even Henry was aware that he was still in the eyes of the world a married man
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
angelosdaughter
angelosdaughter
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.O
Apr 18 2008, 12:01 AM EDT
"Yes, that was permitted to betrothed persons, but another reason for the secrecy of the marriage was that Henry was waiting for the bulls (decrees) from Rome appointing his man Cranmer Archbishop of Canterbury. That gave Cranmer the authority to grant the divorce/annulment. Henry did not want to antagonize Clement VII because then the appointment might not happen. He was in a spot; he needed to marry the pregnant Anne to assure the legitimacy of the child she carried, but he could not let it be generally known that he had. He needed a validly appointed Archbishop to declare his first marriage invalid which Cranmer did on May 23rd 1533. Fraser, "The Six Wives of Henry VIII" pp 187-88, 190,
So at that point even Henry was aware that he was still in the eyes of the world a married man"
...and there is no record that Anne and Henry were ever formally bethrothed, which they could not have been simply because he was aware that the world considered him a married man who was not free to betroth himself to anyone. I think Anne just yielded because Henry showed her by creating her a Marquess that he was serious and she needed to do something to show that she was not just in the affair for the perks. It was a strategic move. She had already captivated his mind and soul; she finally proceeded to captivate his body. It was the last move in her strategy to bind the king to her.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Ginalovestudors
Ginalovestudors
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.O
Apr 18 2008, 7:53 AM EDT
I agree with all of u About the saying No , Anne and Jane and Kathrine said no to him and the pope also. So that is true. Do you find this valuable?    
Boudica
Boudica
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.O
Apr 18 2008, 10:23 AM EDT
"...and there is no record that Anne and Henry were ever formally bethrothed, which they could not have been simply because he was aware that the world considered him a married man who was not free to betroth himself to anyone. I think Anne just yielded because Henry showed her by creating her a Marquess that he was serious and she needed to do something to show that she was not just in the affair for the perks. It was a strategic move. She had already captivated his mind and soul; she finally proceeded to captivate his body. It was the last move in her strategy to bind the king to her. "
That's certainly one way of looking at it. I think it's important to understand Henry's strategy of his creating her a marquess in the first place.
"Jewels were not, however, all that Anne needed to be fitted for the European stage. When Francis I had last seen her she had been a lady-in-waiting to his wife. If she was to meet him now as England's intended queen, she needed status. This she was given at an impressive ceremony in Windsor Castle on the morning of Sunday, 1 September" Ives "Life and Death of Anne Boleyn" page 158
It was unprecidented in English history for a King to marry a untitled courtier, let alone divorcing a Princess to marry one. Becoming a marquess was just another present from the King, it was intended to elevate her status before they were married. While it's true Anne and Henry were never formally betrothed, Henry's intentions were pretty clear by mid 1532.
"It was clear too that the realtionship between Henry and Anne had moved to a different level: the signs were that marriage was an imminent possibility. As well as the gift furnishing of Hanworth, the king talked openly of marrying again." Ives, pg. 156
Despite what the world might have thought of Henry, in his own mind Henry was free to marry again (and once Henry had justified something in his mind, no matter what else might have been the case, there was usually no stopping him) the only obsticles that stood in his way was international opinion of his divorce of Katherine and permission by Chruch authority to marry Anne under the condition that his prior marriage to Katherine was void. Anne's creation of Marquess, was a major strategic step in that direction.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
MsSquirrly
MsSquirrly
RE: Anne is probably the only person to ever say "no" to the King.O
Apr 18 2008, 10:32 AM EDT
I think the point was that Anne was the first person to say to No the King ...that he cared that she said No. He didn't care that Katherine said No....he still got his way. He didn't care that the Pope said No.....he still got his way. He wanted Anne desperately to be his wife and she would not relent until he had promised it. When she had been made Marquess and Katherine had been banished....he made good on his promises and Anne knew he was on a path from which there was no return. To all intents and purposes, they were betrothed. Now she just had to prove that she would get pregnant and live up to her promise of giving him a son.

Of course, we know she couldnt promise and when she failed to provide the son he so craved, as Chapuys said....she had "miscarried of her saviour".

Henry had attained what he so desired ...Anne.....but perhaps the reality of his fantasy wasn't quite what he thought it was. Anne's wit and outspokenness, began to annoy him. There is a story that Henry felt that Anne and her brother made fun of a song he wrote. Soon enough he was looking for new female company. Like the rock stars of today, there were always willing "groupies". Jane Seymour, however, came from an Ambitious family who realised if Jane played "hard to get".....that she could become the King's new obsession. It worked before...why not again. Hold out for marriage. Jane said No too....she just wasnt the first....or the first that he cared about when they said No.
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
2 3 | Next

Related Content

(what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)