Have a Wetpaint account? Sign in
The Tudors Historical INACCURACIES
◄ Back home: The Tudors Fan Wiki
SEE ALSO: The Tudors Depictions Throughout History | The Tudors Photos | The Tudors 100 Reasons to Watch | The Tudors Links & Resources
◄ Back home: The Tudors Fan Wiki
SEE ALSO: The Tudors Depictions Throughout History | The Tudors Photos | The Tudors 100 Reasons to Watch
SEE ALSO: The Tudors Depictions Throughout History | The Tudors Photos | The Tudors 100 Reasons to Watch | The Tudors Links & Resources
| FACT OR FICTION? History buffs! Have you sniffed out a few historical inaccuracies within The Tudors drama? Whether minuscule or huge, catalogue them here to see how the show sizes up against British history. |
| |
| | |
| | |
SEE ALSO: The Tudors Depictions Throughout History | The Tudors Photos | The Tudors 100 Reasons to Watch
|
SemperEadem |
Latest page update: made by SemperEadem
, Wednesday, 12:38 AM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
19 words added view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
jonathan rhys meyers
sam neill
the tudors
the tudors showtime
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EadaoinTheGael | Inaccuracies | 14 | Jun 10 2009, 4:20 PM EDT by CarolineZ | ||
|
Thread started: Apr 11 2009, 12:34 PM EDT
Watch
Well obviously loads of things could have been different. Like the Henry having two sisters thing or about Mary Boleyns children by Henry but I presume that it would have taken way too much time.
With relation to George Boleyn and the rape scene, yes it was kind of unnecessary but they needed a plausible reason for Jane Parker hating him so much. The fact that he was gay (in the show) would not have been enough. That would only embarass her. Whereas the rape would justify her actions completely. Besides, although it is highly unlikely, we never know what goes on behind closed doors. If Jane P had been raped she would never have told anyone. Rape of a wife back then wasnt considered rape. Also, she would be endangering herself by attacking the Queens brothers. And in fairness, Cromwells face when Jane Parker admits gladly that her husband slept with his sister is absolutely priceless. |
|||||
| MsSquirrly | What scene of dramatic license on the series bothered you the most? (page: 1 2 3 4 5) | 96 | Mar 25 2009, 11:18 PM EDT by Anne'sCurls | ||
|
Thread started: Aug 22 2008, 1:16 PM EDT
Watch
For me it was the rape scene with George Boleyn & Jane Parker. What bugged me the most is that it is a horrendous act which has no basis in history and it blackens George's name. According to most historians there is not one "scintilla" of evidence to support his homosexuality plus now they make him a rapist. From what I have read, he was a very well liked member of court & not mean spirited. He admits to his own "sins" of vanity & pride but not a violent man.
14
out of
15 found this valuable.
Do you?
Keyword tags:
adultery
anne boleyn
charles
george boleyn
henryVIII
jane boleyn
mary rose
rape scene
|
|||||
| Maggie-AnneB. | Does It Bother You (page: 1 2 3) | 48 | Mar 9 2009, 4:21 PM EDT by Conyle | ||
|
Thread started: Mar 3 2009, 8:58 PM EST
Watch
At all that the actors don't look like their characters?
Do you find this valuable?
Keyword tags:
The Tudors Inaccuracies
|
|||||
Showing 3 of 11 threads for this page
- view all

