Sign in or 

|
| |
| | |
| | |
|
MsSquirrly |
Latest page update: made by MsSquirrly
, Aug 3 2009, 8:23 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
3 words added 3 words deleted 1 image added 1 image deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
jonathan rhys meyers
sam neill
the tudors
the tudors showtime
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| grahamneil | anachronism | 4 | Jul 22 2009, 10:12 PM EDT by SemperEadem | ||
|
Thread started: Jul 22 2009, 7:40 AM EDT
Watch
Season3 eposide3 Henry says to Jane Seymour that she is "full of the milk of human kindness". This phrase is attribute to Shakespeare -MacBeth. much, much later. Still, the Bard might have got it from the series!
|
|||||
| LadyevaoftheDuttons | Was William Brereton a Jesuit? (Most likely a Knight's Templar!!) | 0 | Jul 12 2009, 5:58 PM EDT by LadyevaoftheDuttons | ||
|
Thread started: Jul 12 2009, 5:58 PM EDT
Watch
When studying Genealogy, the Majority of the Knights in my family were most likely the Knights Templar. They had to give up most of their holdings to the crown in order to take up the vows of Knighthood.
Do you find this valuable?
Keyword tags:
Crowns
Duttons
Jesuits
Kings
Knights Templar
Tudors
William Brereton
|
|||||
| EadaoinTheGael | Inaccuracies | 14 | Jun 10 2009, 4:20 PM EDT by CarolineZ | ||
|
Thread started: Apr 11 2009, 12:34 PM EDT
Watch
Well obviously loads of things could have been different. Like the Henry having two sisters thing or about Mary Boleyns children by Henry but I presume that it would have taken way too much time.
With relation to George Boleyn and the rape scene, yes it was kind of unnecessary but they needed a plausible reason for Jane Parker hating him so much. The fact that he was gay (in the show) would not have been enough. That would only embarass her. Whereas the rape would justify her actions completely. Besides, although it is highly unlikely, we never know what goes on behind closed doors. If Jane P had been raped she would never have told anyone. Rape of a wife back then wasnt considered rape. Also, she would be endangering herself by attacking the Queens brothers. And in fairness, Cromwells face when Jane Parker admits gladly that her husband slept with his sister is absolutely priceless. |
|||||